CSCO vs. LPG
CSCO (Cisco Systems, Inc.) and LPG (Dorian LPG Ltd.) are both stocks. CSCO operates in Communication Equipment (Technology), while LPG operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, CSCO returned 18.92%/yr vs 29.41%/yr for LPG. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CSCO vs. LPG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSCO achieves a 58.91% return, which is significantly lower than LPG's 94.53% return. Over the past 10 years, CSCO has underperformed LPG with an annualized return of 18.92%, while LPG has yielded a comparatively higher 29.41% annualized return.
CSCO
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 18.88%
- YTD
- 58.91%
- 6M
- 57.34%
- 1Y
- 90.30%
- 3Y*
- 37.33%
- 5Y*
- 20.60%
- 10Y*
- 18.92%
LPG
- 1D
- 3.79%
- 1M
- 14.01%
- YTD
- 94.53%
- 6M
- 93.10%
- 1Y
- 108.89%
- 3Y*
- 37.14%
- 5Y*
- 47.82%
- 10Y*
- 29.41%
CSCO vs. LPG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 58.91% | 33.47% | 21.00% | 9.30% | -22.46% | 45.76% | -3.49% | 13.81% | 16.57% | 31.27% |
LPG Dorian LPG Ltd. | 94.53% | 9.75% | -37.80% | 171.42% | 109.62% | 12.71% | -21.25% | 165.52% | -29.08% | 0.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSCO and LPG is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2014 | 0.19 |
Fundamentals
CSCO:
$482.83B
LPG:
$1.93B
CSCO:
$3.00
LPG:
$4.54
CSCO:
40.40
LPG:
9.95
CSCO:
33.90
LPG:
0.15
CSCO:
7.95
LPG:
4.00
CSCO:
9.88
LPG:
1.69
CSCO:
$60.75B
LPG:
$481.51M
CSCO:
$39.08B
LPG:
$415.02M
CSCO:
$13.98B
LPG:
$279.22M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSCO vs. LPG — Risk / Return Rank
CSCO
LPG
CSCO vs. LPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) and Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSCO | LPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.42 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.69 | 4.38 | +2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.37 | 9.39 | +8.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSCO vs. LPG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSCO drawdown since its inception was -89.26%, which is greater than LPG's maximum drawdown of -78.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSCO and LPG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSCO | LPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.26% | -78.31% | -10.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.57% | -24.99% | +11.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.16% | -62.89% | +42.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.68% | -62.89% | +26.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.95% | -62.89% | +20.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.85% | -5.30% | -1.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.11% | -42.68% | +2.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.93% | 11.64% | -6.71% |
Volatility
CSCO vs. LPG - Volatility Comparison
Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) and Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG) have volatilities of 17.31% and 17.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSCO | LPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.31% | 17.04% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.29% | 30.44% | -3.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.93% | 39.81% | -8.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.88% | 43.43% | -18.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.89% | 48.29% | -22.40% |
Dividends
CSCO vs. LPG - Dividend Comparison
CSCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than LPG's 6.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. | 1.36% | 2.12% | 2.69% | 3.07% | 3.17% | 2.32% | 3.20% | 2.88% | 2.95% | 2.95% | 3.28% | 3.02% |
LPG Dorian LPG Ltd. | 6.53% | 10.07% | 16.41% | 9.12% | 29.02% | 7.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CSCO vs. LPG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cisco Systems, Inc. and Dorian LPG Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CSCO and LPG have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CSCO has higher volatility (17.31%) compared to LPG (17.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSCO dropped -89.26% vs LPG's -78.31%.
CSCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSCO and LPG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer