PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSCO vs. COCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CSCO vs. COCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CSCO having a 56.86% return and COCO slightly higher at 58.50%.


CSCO

1D
1.88%
1M
-0.72%
YTD
56.86%
6M
54.08%
1Y
84.40%
3Y*
35.62%
5Y*
21.51%
10Y*
18.83%

COCO

1D
0.45%
1M
10.49%
YTD
58.50%
6M
57.11%
1Y
139.24%
3Y*
42.82%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSCO vs. COCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
56.86%33.47%21.00%9.30%-22.46%12.76%
COCO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc.
58.50%43.62%43.90%85.60%23.72%-27.33%

Correlation

The correlation between CSCO and COCO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2021

0.20

The correlation between CSCO and COCO shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CSCO:

$476.61B

COCO:

$5.08B

EPS

CSCO:

$3.00

COCO:

$1.38

PE Ratio

CSCO:

39.88

COCO:

60.89

PEG Ratio

CSCO:

33.46

COCO:

0.51

PS Ratio

CSCO:

7.85

COCO:

7.67

PB Ratio

CSCO:

9.75

COCO:

14.43

Total Revenue (TTM)

CSCO:

$60.75B

COCO:

$658.62M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CSCO:

$39.08B

COCO:

$246.32M

EBITDA (TTM)

CSCO:

$13.98B

COCO:

$100.45M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSCO vs. COCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSCO
CSCO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CSCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSCO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CSCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSCO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

COCO
COCO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
COCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
COCO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
COCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
COCO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSCO vs. COCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSCOCOCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.44

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.35

5.86

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.05

16.41

+0.64

CSCO vs. COCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSCO Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the COCO Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSCO and COCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSCO vs. COCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSCO drawdown since its inception was -89.26%, which is greater than COCO's maximum drawdown of -56.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSCO and COCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSCOCOCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.26%

-56.97%

-32.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.57%

-23.23%

+9.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.16%

-38.55%

+18.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.05%

0.00%

-8.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.10%

-16.76%

-23.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.05%

8.28%

-3.23%

Volatility

CSCO vs. COCO - Volatility Comparison

Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) has a higher volatility of 11.87% compared to The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) at 9.69%. This indicates that CSCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSCOCOCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.87%

9.69%

+2.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.29%

41.61%

-14.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.94%

52.25%

-21.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.89%

56.71%

-31.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.90%

56.71%

-30.81%

Dividends

CSCO vs. COCO - Dividend Comparison

CSCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, while COCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COCO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.38%2.12%2.69%3.07%3.17%2.32%3.20%2.88%2.95%2.95%3.28%3.02%

Financials

CSCO vs. COCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cisco Systems, Inc. and The Vita Coco Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
15.84B
179.77M
(CSCO) Total Revenue
(COCO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CSCO vs. COCO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cisco Systems, Inc. and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
63.6%
40.0%
Portfolio components
CSCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 10.08B and revenue of 15.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.6%.

COCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 71.81M and revenue of 179.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.0%.

CSCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.96B and revenue of 15.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.0%.

COCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.58M and revenue of 179.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.

CSCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 3.37B and revenue of 15.84B, resulting in a net margin of 21.3%.

COCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported a net income of 30.47M and revenue of 179.77M, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CSCO and COCO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSCO has higher volatility (11.87%) compared to COCO (9.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSCO dropped -89.26% vs COCO's -56.97%.

CSCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSCO and COCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer