CSB vs. SEIS
CSB (VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF) and SEIS (SEI Select Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. CSB is passively managed, while SEIS is actively managed. Over the past year, CSB returned 17.95% vs 30.19% for SEIS. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSB charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for SEIS.
Performance
CSB vs. SEIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSB achieves a 8.30% return, which is significantly lower than SEIS's 14.55% return.
CSB
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -1.58%
- YTD
- 8.30%
- 6M
- 7.74%
- 1Y
- 17.95%
- 3Y*
- 11.48%
- 5Y*
- 3.65%
- 10Y*
- 9.58%
SEIS
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 14.55%
- 6M
- 15.47%
- 1Y
- 30.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSB vs. SEIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 8.30% | 2.26% | 3.71% |
SEIS SEI Select Small Cap ETF | 14.55% | 9.81% | 1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSB and SEIS is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024 | 0.80 |
The correlation between CSB and SEIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSB vs. SEIS — Risk / Return Rank
CSB
SEIS
CSB vs. SEIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) and SEI Select Small Cap ETF (SEIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CSB | SEIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.25 | 1.61 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.92 | 2.35 | -0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.28 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 2.74 | -0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.26 | 9.11 | -1.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CSB | SEIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 1.61 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.72 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
CSB vs. SEIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSB drawdown since its inception was -42.07%, which is greater than SEIS's maximum drawdown of -26.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSB and SEIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSB | SEIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.07% | -26.08% | -15.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.18% | -11.18% | +4.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.12% | -0.01% | -3.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.14% | -6.01% | -1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 3.36% | -0.88% |
Volatility
CSB vs. SEIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) is 3.59%, while SEI Select Small Cap ETF (SEIS) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that CSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSB | SEIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 5.47% | -1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.19% | 13.74% | -4.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.54% | 18.88% | -4.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.78% | 22.13% | -3.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.31% | 22.13% | -0.82% |
CSB vs. SEIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SEIS's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSB vs. SEIS - Dividend Comparison
CSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than SEIS's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.26% | 3.54% | 3.12% | 3.45% | 3.60% | 3.11% | 3.70% | 3.19% | 3.45% | 3.19% | 2.85% | 1.57% |
SEIS SEI Select Small Cap ETF | 0.37% | 0.59% | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSB and SEIS have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SEIS has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to CSB (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSB dropped -42.07% vs SEIS's -26.08%.
On 1-year performance, SEIS leads with 30.19% vs 17.95% for CSB. On fees, CSB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SEIS has performed better with a 30.19% return vs 17.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SEIS.
CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 0.37% for SEIS.
They also come from different issuers: Crestview and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CSB and 0.55% for SEIS.
SEIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSB and SEIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer