CSB vs. PSC
CSB (VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF) and PSC (Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - CSB tracks the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index while PSC tracks the Nasdaq US Small Cap Select Leaders TR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSB returned 4.69%/yr vs 8.77%/yr for PSC. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CSB charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for PSC.
Performance
CSB vs. PSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSB achieves a 11.28% return, which is significantly lower than PSC's 17.73% return.
CSB
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 11.28%
- 6M
- 10.03%
- 1Y
- 20.88%
- 3Y*
- 12.91%
- 5Y*
- 4.69%
- 10Y*
- 10.15%
PSC
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 5.16%
- YTD
- 17.73%
- 6M
- 15.20%
- 1Y
- 31.66%
- 3Y*
- 19.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- —
CSB vs. PSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 11.28% | 2.26% | 9.64% | 12.60% | -13.11% | 27.04% | 11.30% | 21.12% | -7.10% | 11.32% |
PSC Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF | 17.73% | 13.41% | 12.38% | 18.51% | -15.91% | 32.56% | 13.30% | 18.99% | -11.35% | 15.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSB and PSC is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016 | 0.79 |
The correlation between CSB and PSC shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CSB vs. PSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CSB
PSC
Financial Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Technology
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
CSB
PSC
Utilities
CSB
PSC
Consumer Cyclical
CSB
PSC
Energy
CSB
PSC
Industrials
CSB
PSC
Communication Services
CSB
PSC
Consumer Defensive
CSB
PSC
Basic Materials
CSB
PSC
Technology
CSB
PSC
Healthcare
CSB
PSC
Real Estate
CSB
-
PSC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSB vs. PSC — Risk / Return Rank
CSB
PSC
CSB vs. PSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) and Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSB | PSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.29 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 3.20 | -0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.44 | 11.15 | -2.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSB vs. PSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSB drawdown since its inception was -42.07%, smaller than the maximum PSC drawdown of -46.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSB and PSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSB | PSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.07% | -46.69% | +4.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.18% | -9.95% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.82% | -23.49% | +1.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.49% | -25.86% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -0.58% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.11% | -8.23% | +1.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 2.85% | -0.37% |
Volatility
CSB vs. PSC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) is 3.79%, while Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF (PSC) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that CSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSB | PSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | 5.38% | -1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.28% | 13.32% | -4.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.48% | 18.96% | -4.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.71% | 21.02% | -2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.31% | 23.28% | -1.97% |
CSB vs. PSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PSC's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSB vs. PSC - Dividend Comparison
CSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than PSC's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.22% | 3.54% | 3.12% | 3.45% | 3.60% | 3.11% | 3.70% | 3.19% | 3.45% | 3.19% | 2.85% | 1.57% |
PSC Principal U.S. Small Cap Multi-Factor ETF | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.73% | 1.92% | 1.45% | 1.25% | 1.47% | 1.30% | 0.95% | 0.35% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSB and PSC have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSC has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to CSB (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSB dropped -42.07% vs PSC's -46.69%.
On 5-year performance, PSC leads with 8.77% vs 4.69% for CSB. On fees, CSB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PSC has performed better with a 8.77% return vs 4.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CSB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for PSC.
CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 0.57% for PSC.
CSB tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index, while PSC tracks Nasdaq US Small Cap Select Leaders TR Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Principal. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CSB and 0.38% for PSC.
PSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CSB and PSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer