PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSB vs. OILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSB vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSB achieves a 8.30% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.


CSB

1D
-1.09%
1M
-1.58%
YTD
8.30%
6M
7.74%
1Y
17.95%
3Y*
11.48%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
9.58%

OILK

1D
1.40%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
64.22%
6M
60.70%
1Y
58.99%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSB vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
8.30%2.26%9.64%12.60%-13.11%27.04%11.30%21.12%-7.10%11.32%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
64.22%-11.86%8.18%-0.97%27.57%63.71%-61.09%30.48%-20.40%2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CSB and OILK is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2016

0.20

The correlation between CSB and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CSB vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CSB
OILK

Financial Services

26.5%

-

Utilities

22.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

19.0%
100.0%

Energy

11.5%

-

Industrials

8.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.4%

-

Communication Services

3.6%

-

Basic Materials

3.4%

-

Technology

1.2%

-

Healthcare

0.4%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

CSB
26.5%
OILK

-

Utilities

CSB
22.0%
OILK

-

Consumer Cyclical

CSB
19.0%
OILK
100.0%

Energy

CSB
11.5%
OILK

-

Industrials

CSB
8.5%
OILK

-

Consumer Defensive

CSB
4.4%
OILK

-

Communication Services

CSB
3.6%
OILK

-

Basic Materials

CSB
3.4%
OILK

-

Technology

CSB
1.2%
OILK

-

Healthcare

CSB
0.4%
OILK

-

Real Estate

CSB

-

OILK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSB vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSB
CSB Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSB Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSB Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSB vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSBOILKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.34

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

3.42

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.26

6.91

+0.35

CSB vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSB and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSBOILKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

2.06

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.59

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.12

+0.33

Drawdowns

CSB vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSB drawdown since its inception was -42.07%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSB and OILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSBOILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.07%

-83.76%

+41.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.18%

-17.35%

+10.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.82%

-23.42%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.49%

-34.69%

+10.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.12%

-3.66%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.14%

-32.61%

+25.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

8.56%

-6.08%

Volatility

CSB vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) is 3.59%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that CSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSBOILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

10.44%

-6.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.19%

23.26%

-14.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.54%

28.75%

-14.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.78%

30.12%

-11.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.31%

35.97%

-14.66%

CSB vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSB vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

CSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.26%3.54%3.12%3.45%3.60%3.11%3.70%3.19%3.45%3.19%2.85%1.57%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
8.18%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSB and OILK have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to CSB (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSB dropped -42.07% vs OILK's -83.76%.

On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 3.65% for CSB. On fees, CSB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 3.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CSB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 3.26% for CSB.

CSB is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. CSB tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CSB and 0.68% for OILK.

OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSB and OILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer