PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSB vs. IJR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSB vs. IJR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSB achieves a 8.30% return, which is significantly lower than IJR's 15.38% return. Over the past 10 years, CSB has underperformed IJR with an annualized return of 9.58%, while IJR has yielded a comparatively higher 10.66% annualized return.


CSB

1D
-1.09%
1M
-1.58%
YTD
8.30%
6M
7.74%
1Y
17.95%
3Y*
11.48%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
9.58%

IJR

1D
-0.89%
1M
1.67%
YTD
15.38%
6M
14.25%
1Y
31.54%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*
10.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSB vs. IJR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
8.30%2.26%9.64%12.60%-13.11%27.04%11.30%21.12%-7.10%11.32%
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
15.38%5.89%8.63%16.06%-16.20%26.58%11.28%22.82%-8.51%13.15%

Correlation

The correlation between CSB and IJR is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2015

0.88

The correlation between CSB and IJR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

CSB vs. IJR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CSB
IJR

Financial Services

26.5%
16.8%

Utilities

22.0%
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

19.0%
13.4%

Energy

11.5%
5.9%

Industrials

8.5%
15.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
3.5%

Communication Services

3.6%
3.6%

Basic Materials

3.4%
5.1%

Technology

1.2%
15.5%

Healthcare

0.4%
11.1%

Real Estate

-

7.6%

Financial Services

CSB
26.5%
IJR
16.8%

Utilities

CSB
22.0%
IJR
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

CSB
19.0%
IJR
13.4%

Energy

CSB
11.5%
IJR
5.9%

Industrials

CSB
8.5%
IJR
15.5%

Consumer Defensive

CSB
4.4%
IJR
3.5%

Communication Services

CSB
3.6%
IJR
3.6%

Basic Materials

CSB
3.4%
IJR
5.1%

Technology

CSB
1.2%
IJR
15.5%

Healthcare

CSB
0.4%
IJR
11.1%

Real Estate

CSB

-

IJR
7.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSB vs. IJR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSB
CSB Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSB Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSB Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

IJR
IJR Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
IJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJR Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
IJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJR Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSB vs. IJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSBIJRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.31

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

3.65

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.26

12.14

-4.89

CSB vs. IJR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the IJR Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSB and IJR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSBIJRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.81

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.26

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.47

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.43

+0.01

Drawdowns

CSB vs. IJR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSB drawdown since its inception was -42.07%, smaller than the maximum IJR drawdown of -58.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSB and IJR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSBIJRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.07%

-58.15%

+16.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.18%

-8.68%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.82%

-28.02%

+6.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.49%

-28.02%

+3.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.07%

-44.36%

+2.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.12%

-0.91%

-2.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.14%

-9.28%

+2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

2.60%

-0.12%

Volatility

CSB vs. IJR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) is 3.59%, while iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) has a volatility of 4.45%. This indicates that CSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSBIJRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

4.45%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.19%

11.65%

-2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.54%

17.54%

-3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.78%

21.41%

-2.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.31%

22.91%

-1.60%

CSB vs. IJR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IJR's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSB vs. IJR - Dividend Comparison

CSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than IJR's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.26%3.54%3.12%3.45%3.60%3.11%3.70%3.19%3.45%3.19%2.85%1.57%
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
1.15%1.44%2.05%1.31%1.41%1.53%1.11%1.44%1.58%1.20%1.22%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSB and IJR have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IJR has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to CSB (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSB dropped -42.07% vs IJR's -58.15%.

On 10-year performance, IJR leads with 10.66% vs 9.58% for CSB. On fees, IJR is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, CSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IJR has performed better with a 10.66% return vs 9.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJR is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CSB.

CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 1.15% for IJR.

CSB tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index, while IJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CSB and 0.06% for IJR.

IJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSB and IJR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer