PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSB vs. CALF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CSB vs. CALF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSB achieves a 8.30% return, which is significantly lower than CALF's 13.34% return.


CSB

1D
-1.09%
1M
-1.58%
YTD
8.30%
6M
7.74%
1Y
17.95%
3Y*
11.48%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
9.58%

CALF

1D
-1.12%
1M
4.91%
YTD
13.34%
6M
12.53%
1Y
30.24%
3Y*
10.69%
5Y*
4.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSB vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
8.30%2.26%9.64%12.60%-13.11%27.04%11.30%21.12%-7.10%11.97%
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
13.34%2.33%-7.41%35.43%-15.20%40.68%16.55%18.18%-10.06%5.78%

Correlation

The correlation between CSB and CALF is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2017

0.85

The correlation between CSB and CALF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

CSB vs. CALF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CSB
CALF

Financial Services

26.5%
0.2%

Utilities

22.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

19.0%
28.3%

Energy

11.5%
10.3%

Industrials

8.5%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
4.3%

Communication Services

3.6%
8.8%

Basic Materials

3.4%
1.6%

Technology

1.2%
29.7%

Healthcare

0.4%
9.4%

Real Estate

-

1.6%

Financial Services

CSB
26.5%
CALF
0.2%

Utilities

CSB
22.0%
CALF

-

Consumer Cyclical

CSB
19.0%
CALF
28.3%

Energy

CSB
11.5%
CALF
10.3%

Industrials

CSB
8.5%
CALF
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

CSB
4.4%
CALF
4.3%

Communication Services

CSB
3.6%
CALF
8.8%

Basic Materials

CSB
3.4%
CALF
1.6%

Technology

CSB
1.2%
CALF
29.7%

Healthcare

CSB
0.4%
CALF
9.4%

Real Estate

CSB

-

CALF
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSB vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSB
CSB Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSB Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSB Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

CALF
CALF Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CALF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CALF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CALF Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CALF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CALF Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSB vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CSBCALFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.25

1.93

-0.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.92

2.82

-0.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.34

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

4.94

-2.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.26

14.08

-6.82

CSB vs. CALF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the CALF Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSB and CALF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CSBCALFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.93

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.18

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.37

+0.08

Drawdowns

CSB vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSB drawdown since its inception was -42.07%, smaller than the maximum CALF drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSB and CALF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSBCALFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.07%

-47.58%

+5.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.18%

-6.15%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.82%

-34.22%

+12.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.49%

-34.22%

+9.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.12%

-1.95%

-1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.14%

-10.74%

+3.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

2.15%

+0.33%

Volatility

CSB vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) is 3.59%, while Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) has a volatility of 4.92%. This indicates that CSB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CALF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSBCALFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

4.92%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.19%

10.47%

-1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.54%

15.84%

-1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.78%

23.44%

-4.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.31%

26.02%

-4.71%

CSB vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CSB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

CSB vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison

CSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than CALF's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.28%1.43%1.07%1.18%0.85%2.63%0.82%0.99%1.39%0.70%0.00%0.00%
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.26%3.54%3.12%3.45%3.60%3.11%3.70%3.19%3.45%3.19%2.85%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


CSB and CALF have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CALF has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to CSB (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSB dropped -42.07% vs CALF's -47.58%.

On 5-year performance, CALF leads with 4.12% vs 3.65% for CSB. On fees, CSB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, CALF has performed better with a 4.12% return vs 3.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CSB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CALF.

CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 1.28% for CALF.

CSB tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index, while CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CSB and 0.59% for CALF.

CALF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSB and CALF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer