CSAV.TO vs. CLML.TO
CSAV.TO (CI High Interest Savings ETF) and CLML.TO (CI Global Climate Leaders Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - CSAV.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by CI, while CLML.TO is a Alternative Energy Equities fund actively managed by CI. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CSAV.TO returned 3.13%/yr vs 20.37%/yr for CLML.TO. Their 0.01 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CSAV.TO charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CLML.TO.
Performance
CSAV.TO vs. CLML.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CSAV.TO achieves a 1.18% return, which is significantly lower than CLML.TO's 24.04% return.
CSAV.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 2.17%
- 3Y*
- 3.44%
- 5Y*
- 3.13%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.53%
CLML.TO
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -8.07%
- 6M
- 17.71%
- YTD
- 24.04%
- 1Y
- 32.66%
- 3Y*
- 36.77%
- 5Y*
- 20.37%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$201.36K | CA$413.19K | CA$399.09K | |
CSAV.TO CI High Interest Savings ETF | CA$1.49M | CA$1.26M | CA$1.48M |
CSAV.TO vs. CLML.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSAV.TO CI High Interest Savings ETF | 1.18% | 2.54% | 4.43% | 5.04% | 2.29% | 0.25% |
CLML.TO CI Global Climate Leaders Fund | 24.04% | 25.21% | 63.19% | 12.83% | -18.69% | 9.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between CSAV.TO and CLML.TO is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2021 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CSAV.TO vs. CLML.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CSAV.TO
CLML.TO
CSAV.TO vs. CLML.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI High Interest Savings ETF (CSAV.TO) and CI Global Climate Leaders Fund (CLML.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CSAV.TO | CLML.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +7.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +17.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 4.54 | 1.23 | +3.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 108.77 | 1.97 | +106.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 301.45 | 7.95 | +293.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CSAV.TO vs. CLML.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CSAV.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.02%, smaller than the maximum CLML.TO drawdown of -28.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSAV.TO and CLML.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CSAV.TO | CLML.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.02% | -28.17% | +28.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.02% | -15.61% | +15.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.02% | -25.94% | +25.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.02% | -28.17% | +28.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -11.92% | +11.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -8.87% | +8.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 3.86% | -3.85% |
Volatility
CSAV.TO vs. CLML.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CI High Interest Savings ETF (CSAV.TO) is 0.07%, while CI Global Climate Leaders Fund (CLML.TO) has a volatility of 7.85%. This indicates that CSAV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLML.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CSAV.TO | CLML.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.07% | 7.85% | -7.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.18% | 19.77% | -19.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25% | 23.72% | -23.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.28% | 21.27% | -20.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.27% | 21.17% | -20.90% |
CSAV.TO vs. CLML.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CSAV.TO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CLML.TO's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
CSAV.TO vs. CLML.TO - Dividend Comparison
CSAV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, while CLML.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLML.TO CI Global Climate Leaders Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CSAV.TO CI High Interest Savings ETF | 2.16% | 2.53% | 4.40% | 4.90% | 2.15% | 0.57% | 0.89% | 1.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CSAV.TO and CLML.TO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSAV.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSAV.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CLML.TO.
CSAV.TO is categorized as Money Market, while CLML.TO is Alternative Energy Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CSAV.TO and 0.99% for CLML.TO.
Find the right allocation for CSAV.TO and CLML.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer