CRXP vs. MBS
CRXP (Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF) and MBS (Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CRXP charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for MBS.
Performance
CRXP vs. MBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRXP achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than MBS's 0.74% return.
CRXP
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MBS
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 6.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRXP vs. MBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRXP Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.68% | -0.08% |
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 0.74% | 0.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRXP and MBS is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRXP vs. MBS — Risk / Return Rank
CRXP
MBS
CRXP vs. MBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF (CRXP) and Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRXP | MBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 1.61 | -1.28 |
Drawdowns
CRXP vs. MBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRXP drawdown since its inception was -2.80%, smaller than the maximum MBS drawdown of -4.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRXP and MBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRXP | MBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.80% | -4.09% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -1.35% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.92% | -1.02% | +0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.70% | — |
Volatility
CRXP vs. MBS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRXP | MBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.93% | 2.93% | +1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.93% | 3.99% | -0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.93% | 3.99% | -0.06% |
CRXP vs. MBS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRXP has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than MBS's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRXP vs. MBS - Dividend Comparison
CRXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than MBS's 5.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CRXP Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF | 2.08% | 0.17% | 0.00% |
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 5.61% | 5.28% | 4.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRXP and MBS have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRXP is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRXP is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MBS.
MBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.61%, compared with 2.08% for CRXP.
They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and Angel Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for CRXP and 0.49% for MBS.
Find the right allocation for CRXP and MBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer