CRXP vs. DBND
CRXP (Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF) and DBND (DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. CRXP is actively managed, while DBND is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CRXP charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DBND.
Performance
CRXP vs. DBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRXP achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly higher than DBND's -0.12% return.
CRXP
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBND
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- -0.12%
- 6M
- 0.14%
- 1Y
- 4.38%
- 3Y*
- 4.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRXP vs. DBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRXP Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.68% | -0.08% |
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF | -0.12% | 0.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRXP and DBND is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRXP vs. DBND — Risk / Return Rank
CRXP
DBND
CRXP vs. DBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF (CRXP) and DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF (DBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRXP | DBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.48 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
CRXP vs. DBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRXP drawdown since its inception was -2.80%, smaller than the maximum DBND drawdown of -9.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRXP and DBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRXP | DBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.80% | -9.39% | +6.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -1.71% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.92% | -2.27% | +1.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.96% | — |
Volatility
CRXP vs. DBND - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRXP | DBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.93% | 3.30% | +0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.93% | 5.09% | -1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.93% | 5.09% | -1.16% |
CRXP vs. DBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRXP has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than DBND's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRXP vs. DBND - Dividend Comparison
CRXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than DBND's 4.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRXP Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF | 2.08% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DBND DoubleLine Opportunistic Bond ETF | 4.78% | 4.78% | 5.19% | 4.39% | 2.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRXP and DBND have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRXP is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRXP is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DBND.
DBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 2.08% for CRXP.
They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for CRXP and 0.50% for DBND.
Find the right allocation for CRXP and DBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer