CRXP vs. CFIT
CRXP (Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF) and CFIT (Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CRXP charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for CFIT.
Performance
CRXP vs. CFIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRXP achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly lower than CFIT's 3.70% return.
CRXP
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- 6M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CFIT
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- 3.70%
- 1Y
- 7.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $164.06K | $239.62K | $547.04K | |
| $4.49K | $319.92K | $113.61K |
CRXP vs. CFIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRXP Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF | -0.10% | -0.22% |
CFIT Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF | 3.70% | -0.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRXP and CFIT is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRXP vs. CFIT — Risk / Return Rank
CRXP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CFIT
CRXP vs. CFIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF (CRXP) and Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRXP | CFIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.88 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.09 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRXP vs. CFIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRXP drawdown since its inception was -2.80%, smaller than the maximum CFIT drawdown of -4.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRXP and CFIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRXP | CFIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.80% | -4.23% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.22% | -2.40% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.04% | -1.24% | +0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.30% | — |
Volatility
CRXP vs. CFIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRXP | CFIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.88% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76% | 5.98% | -2.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.76% | 5.66% | -1.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.76% | 5.66% | -1.90% |
CRXP vs. CFIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRXP has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than CFIT's 0.71% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRXP vs. CFIT - Dividend Comparison
CRXP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than CFIT's 3.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CFIT Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF | 3.92% | 3.14% |
CRXP Columbia Core Plus Bond ETF | 2.53% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRXP and CFIT have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRXP is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRXP is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for CFIT.
CFIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 2.53% for CRXP.
They also come from different issuers: Columbia and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for CRXP and 0.71% for CFIT.
Find the right allocation for CRXP and CFIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer