PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRWV vs. WGMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRWV vs. WGMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) and CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRWV achieves a 2.02% return, which is significantly lower than WGMI's 37.71% return.


CRWV

1D
-0.20%
1M
-38.06%
6M
-27.83%
YTD
2.02%
1Y
-40.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
61.39%

WGMI

1D
10.78%
1M
-26.91%
6M
3.21%
YTD
37.71%
1Y
97.01%
3Y*
48.22%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRWV vs. WGMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CRWV
CoreWeave, Inc.
2.02%83.62%
WGMI
CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF
37.71%172.58%

Correlation

The correlation between CRWV and WGMI is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025

0.57

The correlation between CRWV and WGMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRWV vs. WGMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRWV
CRWV Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CRWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRWV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
CRWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRWV Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

WGMI
WGMI Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
WGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
WGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
WGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
WGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRWV vs. WGMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) and CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRWVWGMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.22

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

1.91

-2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.17

3.77

-4.94

CRWV vs. WGMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRWV Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the WGMI Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRWV and WGMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRWV vs. WGMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRWV drawdown since its inception was -64.84%, smaller than the maximum WGMI drawdown of -85.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWV and WGMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRWVWGMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.84%

-85.76%

+20.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.61%

-50.94%

-5.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.20%

-26.91%

-33.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.10%

-42.09%

+3.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.68%

25.85%

+8.83%

Volatility

CRWV vs. WGMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) is 22.14%, while CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI) has a volatility of 24.38%. This indicates that CRWV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WGMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRWVWGMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.14%

24.38%

-2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

65.28%

57.47%

+7.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

93.87%

78.75%

+15.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

112.01%

81.64%

+30.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

112.01%

81.64%

+30.37%

Dividends

CRWV vs. WGMI - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRWV nor WGMI has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
CRWV
CoreWeave, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WGMI
CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF
0.00%0.00%0.22%0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRWV and WGMI have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WGMI has higher volatility (24.38%) compared to CRWV (22.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRWV dropped -64.84% vs WGMI's -85.76%.

WGMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRWV and WGMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer