CRWU vs. SPUU
CRWU (T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF) and SPUU (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CRWU is actively managed, while SPUU is passively managed. Over the past year, CRWU returned -83.81% vs 38.14% for SPUU. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CRWU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SPUU.
Performance
CRWU vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWU achieves a -45.03% return, which is significantly lower than SPUU's 16.72% return.
CRWU
- 1D
- -5.95%
- 1M
- -30.53%
- 6M
- -65.39%
- YTD
- -45.03%
- 1Y
- -83.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -87.28%
SPUU
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 14.02%
- YTD
- 16.72%
- 1Y
- 38.14%
- 3Y*
- 31.33%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- 23.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 21.37%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $23.19M | $20.12M | $19.78M | |
| $4.20M | $4.55M | $4.33M |
CRWU vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRWU T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF | -45.03% | -77.60% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF | 16.72% | 13.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWU and SPUU is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWU vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank
CRWU
SPUU
CRWU vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRWU | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.23 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | 1.85 | -2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | 7.47 | -8.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRWU vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWU drawdown since its inception was -93.88%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWU and SPUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWU | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.88% | -59.35% | -34.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -93.88% | -18.19% | -75.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.79% | -3.83% | -87.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.42% | -9.44% | -58.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 72.23% | 4.51% | +67.72% |
Volatility
CRWU vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison
T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU) has a higher volatility of 62.12% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) at 7.10%. This indicates that CRWU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWU | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 62.12% | 7.10% | +55.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 138.63% | 20.38% | +118.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 194.05% | 25.88% | +168.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 193.12% | 33.70% | +159.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 193.12% | 35.79% | +157.33% |
CRWU vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRWU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRWU vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison
CRWU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.48%, more than SPUU's 1.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRWU T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF | 15.48% | 8.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF | 1.34% | 1.63% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 0.88% | 3.04% | 8.03% | 1.80% | 5.50% | 6.96% | 8.08% | 4.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWU and SPUU have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRWU has higher volatility (62.12%) compared to SPUU (7.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRWU dropped -93.88% vs SPUU's -59.35%.
On 1-year performance, SPUU leads with 38.14% vs -83.81% for CRWU. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 7.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 38.14% return vs -83.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRWU.
CRWU has the higher dividend yield at 15.48%, compared with 1.34% for SPUU.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRWU and 0.60% for SPUU.
SPUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRWU and SPUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer