CRWU vs. LINT

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

CRWU (T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CRWU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

CRWU vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRWU achieves a -45.03% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 259.95% return.

CRWU

• 1D: -5.95%
• 1M: -30.53%
• 6M: -65.39%
• YTD: -45.03%
• 1Y: -83.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -87.28%

LINT

• 1D: -2.72%
• 1M: -47.53%
• 6M: 154.25%
• YTD: 259.95%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CRWU T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF	$23.19M	$20.12M	$19.78M
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	$19.47M	$20.67M	$35.74M

CRWU vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CRWU T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF	-45.03%	-19.04%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	259.95%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between CRWU and LINT is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.34

Return for Risk

CRWU vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CRWU

CRWU Risk / Return Rank: 5
CRWU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
CRWU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
CRWU Omega Ratio Rank: 8
CRWU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
CRWU Martin Ratio Rank: 3

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CRWU vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRWU	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.45	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.11	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.92	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.20	—	—

Drawdowns

CRWU vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRWU drawdown since its inception was -93.88%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWU and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRWU	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.88%	-69.02%	-24.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-93.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.79%	-62.88%	-28.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-68.42%	-23.85%	-44.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	72.23%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRWU	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	62.12%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	138.63%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	194.05%	169.51%	+24.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	193.12%	169.51%	+23.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	193.12%	169.51%	+23.61%

CRWU vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRWU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRWU vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

CRWU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.48%, more than LINT's 0.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CRWU T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF	15.48%	8.51%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.76%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRWU and LINT in my portfolio?

CRWU and LINT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRWU or LINT?

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRWU or LINT?

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRWU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRWU or LINT?

CRWU has the higher dividend yield at 15.48%, compared with 0.76% for LINT.

What is the main difference between CRWU and LINT?

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRWU and 0.97% for LINT.