CRWU vs. GLWG
CRWU (T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF) and GLWG (Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CRWU is actively managed, while GLWG is passively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRWU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GLWG.
Performance
CRWU vs. GLWG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CRWU
- 1D
- -5.07%
- 1M
- -33.95%
- YTD
- 48.91%
- 6M
- -4.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLWG
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 39.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRWU vs. GLWG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CRWU T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF | 70.23% |
GLWG Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF | 80.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWU and GLWG is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2026 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWU vs. GLWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF (GLWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRWU | GLWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.37 | 7.40 | -7.77 |
Drawdowns
CRWU vs. GLWG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWU drawdown since its inception was -89.37%, which is greater than GLWG's maximum drawdown of -29.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWU and GLWG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWU | GLWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.37% | -29.53% | -59.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.77% | -12.84% | -64.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.57% | -10.74% | -54.83% |
Volatility
CRWU vs. GLWG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWU | GLWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 191.93% | 150.03% | +41.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 191.93% | 150.03% | +41.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 191.93% | 150.03% | +41.90% |
CRWU vs. GLWG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRWU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GLWG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRWU vs. GLWG - Dividend Comparison
CRWU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, while GLWG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CRWU T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF | 5.71% | 8.51% |
GLWG Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWU and GLWG have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GLWG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GLWG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRWU.
CRWU has the higher dividend yield at 5.71%, compared with 0.00% for GLWG.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRWU and 0.75% for GLWG.
Find the right allocation for CRWU and GLWG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer