CRWU vs. ASMG
CRWU (T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF) and ASMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRWU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ASMG.
Performance
CRWU vs. ASMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWU achieves a 48.91% return, which is significantly lower than ASMG's 135.99% return.
CRWU
- 1D
- -5.07%
- 1M
- -33.95%
- YTD
- 48.91%
- 6M
- -4.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASMG
- 1D
- 3.70%
- 1M
- 43.96%
- YTD
- 135.99%
- 6M
- 116.32%
- 1Y
- 327.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRWU vs. ASMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRWU T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF | 48.91% | -76.87% |
ASMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF | 135.99% | 104.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWU and ASMG is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWU vs. ASMG — Risk / Return Rank
CRWU
ASMG
CRWU vs. ASMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRWU | ASMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.37 | 1.97 | -2.34 |
Drawdowns
CRWU vs. ASMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWU drawdown since its inception was -89.37%, which is greater than ASMG's maximum drawdown of -43.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWU and ASMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWU | ASMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.37% | -43.95% | -45.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -34.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.77% | 0.00% | -77.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.57% | -13.24% | -52.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 13.85% | — |
Volatility
CRWU vs. ASMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWU | ASMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 28.61% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 64.25% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 191.93% | 81.20% | +110.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 191.93% | 84.41% | +107.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 191.93% | 84.41% | +107.52% |
CRWU vs. ASMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRWU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRWU vs. ASMG - Dividend Comparison
CRWU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, more than ASMG's 4.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ASMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF | 4.75% | 11.20% |
CRWU T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF | 5.71% | 8.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWU and ASMG have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRWU.
CRWU has the higher dividend yield at 5.71%, compared with 4.75% for ASMG.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRWU and 0.75% for ASMG.
Find the right allocation for CRWU and ASMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer