CRWU vs. ARMG
CRWU (T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF) and ARMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRWU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARMG.
Performance
CRWU vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWU achieves a 48.91% return, which is significantly lower than ARMG's 841.05% return.
CRWU
- 1D
- -5.07%
- 1M
- -33.95%
- YTD
- 48.91%
- 6M
- -4.96%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMG
- 1D
- -9.19%
- 1M
- 211.14%
- YTD
- 841.05%
- 6M
- 460.44%
- 1Y
- 443.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRWU vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRWU T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF | 48.91% | -76.87% |
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 841.05% | -61.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWU and ARMG is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWU vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank
CRWU
ARMG
CRWU vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF (CRWU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRWU | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.37 | 1.10 | -1.48 |
Drawdowns
CRWU vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWU drawdown since its inception was -89.37%, which is greater than ARMG's maximum drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWU and ARMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWU | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.37% | -80.28% | -9.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -68.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.77% | -9.19% | -68.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.57% | -52.91% | -12.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 38.55% | — |
Volatility
CRWU vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWU | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 66.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 104.49% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 191.93% | 130.67% | +61.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 191.93% | 138.36% | +53.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 191.93% | 138.36% | +53.57% |
CRWU vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRWU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRWU vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison
CRWU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, more than ARMG's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 0.52% | 4.86% |
CRWU T-REX 2X Long CRWV Daily Target ETF | 5.71% | 8.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWU and ARMG have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CRWU.
CRWU has the higher dividend yield at 5.71%, compared with 0.52% for ARMG.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CRWU and 0.75% for ARMG.
Find the right allocation for CRWU and ARMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer