CRWD vs. GS
CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) and GS (The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.) are both stocks. CRWD operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while GS operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, CRWD returned 24.18%/yr vs 25.98%/yr for GS. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CRWD vs. GS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWD achieves a 45.66% return, which is significantly higher than GS's 22.08% return.
CRWD
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- 14.93%
- YTD
- 45.66%
- 6M
- 35.27%
- 1Y
- 42.07%
- 3Y*
- 64.60%
- 5Y*
- 24.18%
- 10Y*
- —
GS
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- 12.54%
- YTD
- 22.08%
- 6M
- 20.84%
- 1Y
- 76.70%
- 3Y*
- 49.31%
- 5Y*
- 25.98%
- 10Y*
- 24.48%
CRWD vs. GS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 45.66% | 37.00% | 34.01% | 142.49% | -48.58% | -3.34% | 324.74% | -21.46% |
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 22.08% | 56.64% | 52.03% | 15.91% | -7.87% | 47.61% | 17.45% | 19.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWD and GS is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2019 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
CRWD:
$176.08B
GS:
$327.33B
CRWD:
-$0.02
GS:
$57.41
CRWD:
34.09
GS:
3.02
CRWD:
38.00
GS:
2.66
CRWD:
$5.09B
GS:
$110.77B
CRWD:
$3.82B
GS:
$61.53B
CRWD:
$246.78M
GS:
$24.94B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWD vs. GS — Risk / Return Rank
CRWD
GS
CRWD vs. GS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRWD | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.41 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 3.80 | -2.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.57 | 12.61 | -10.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRWD vs. GS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWD drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, smaller than the maximum GS drawdown of -78.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWD and GS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWD | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.69% | -78.84% | +11.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.18% | -19.42% | -17.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.44% | -30.90% | -13.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.69% | -32.84% | -34.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.70% | -2.73% | -9.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.61% | -22.65% | -0.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.29% | 5.84% | +10.45% |
Volatility
CRWD vs. GS - Volatility Comparison
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) has a higher volatility of 18.47% compared to The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) at 11.84%. This indicates that CRWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWD | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.47% | 11.84% | +6.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.66% | 23.47% | +14.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.48% | 28.55% | +16.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.78% | 28.10% | +22.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.07% | 29.87% | +26.20% |
Dividends
CRWD vs. GS - Dividend Comparison
CRWD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 1.60% | 1.59% | 2.01% | 2.72% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.89% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.41% |
Financials
CRWD vs. GS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CRWD vs. GS - Profitability Comparison
CRWD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.04B and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.3%.
GS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 16.91B and revenue of 17.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.2%.
CRWD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -30.60M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.2%.
GS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.49B and revenue of 17.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.7%.
CRWD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 45.97M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.
GS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a net income of 5.63B and revenue of 17.23B, resulting in a net margin of 32.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWD and GS have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRWD has higher volatility (18.47%) compared to GS (11.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRWD dropped -67.69% vs GS's -78.84%.
GS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRWD and GS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer