CRWD vs. AB
CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.) and AB (AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.) are both stocks. CRWD operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while AB operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, CRWD returned 24.23%/yr vs 3.82%/yr for AB. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CRWD vs. AB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRWD achieves a 47.82% return, which is significantly higher than AB's -2.07% return.
CRWD
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- 16.64%
- YTD
- 47.82%
- 6M
- 42.14%
- 1Y
- 44.17%
- 3Y*
- 64.68%
- 5Y*
- 24.23%
- 10Y*
- —
AB
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -5.33%
- YTD
- -2.07%
- 6M
- -5.60%
- 1Y
- -0.43%
- 3Y*
- 11.86%
- 5Y*
- 3.82%
- 10Y*
- 14.11%
CRWD vs. AB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 47.82% | 37.00% | 34.01% | 142.49% | -48.58% | -3.34% | 324.74% | -21.46% |
AB AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | -2.07% | 13.36% | 30.40% | -2.29% | -23.46% | 56.27% | 23.00% | 12.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRWD and AB is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2019 | 0.25 |
The correlation between CRWD and AB shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CRWD:
$178.69B
AB:
$3.33B
CRWD:
-$0.02
AB:
$3.22
CRWD:
34.59
AB:
13.92
CRWD:
38.56
AB:
2.64
CRWD:
$5.09B
AB:
$250.00M
CRWD:
$3.82B
AB:
$250.00M
CRWD:
$246.78M
AB:
$252.50M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRWD vs. AB — Risk / Return Rank
CRWD
AB
CRWD vs. AB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRWD | AB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.02 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.19 | -0.03 | +1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.72 | -0.06 | +2.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRWD vs. AB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRWD drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, smaller than the maximum AB drawdown of -87.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRWD and AB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRWD | AB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.69% | -87.65% | +19.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.18% | -14.68% | -22.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.44% | -20.59% | -23.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.69% | -45.76% | -21.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -58.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.41% | -11.96% | +0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.61% | -26.20% | +2.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.31% | 6.83% | +9.48% |
Volatility
CRWD vs. AB - Volatility Comparison
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD) has a higher volatility of 18.35% compared to AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. (AB) at 4.19%. This indicates that CRWD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRWD | AB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.35% | 4.19% | +14.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.68% | 17.94% | +19.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.58% | 22.36% | +23.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.79% | 28.24% | +22.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 56.06% | 32.39% | +23.67% |
Dividends
CRWD vs. AB - Dividend Comparison
CRWD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AB AllianceBernstein Holding L.P. | 9.46% | 9.02% | 8.03% | 8.44% | 10.30% | 7.33% | 8.26% | 7.67% | 10.54% | 8.50% | 7.46% | 8.09% |
CRWD CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CRWD vs. AB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. and AllianceBernstein Holding L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CRWD and AB have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRWD has higher volatility (18.35%) compared to AB (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRWD dropped -67.69% vs AB's -87.65%.
CRWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRWD and AB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer