PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRVS vs. NUKZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRVS vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CRVS) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRVS achieves a 54.94% return, which is significantly higher than NUKZ's 7.57% return.


CRVS

1D
2.84%
1M
-24.68%
YTD
54.94%
6M
42.53%
1Y
181.37%
3Y*
53.32%
5Y*
33.63%
10Y*
0.06%

NUKZ

1D
1.59%
1M
-5.07%
YTD
7.57%
6M
4.81%
1Y
27.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRVS vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CRVS
Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
54.94%43.93%162.25%
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF
7.57%56.57%60.11%

Correlation

The correlation between CRVS and NUKZ is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRVS vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRVS
CRVS Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CRVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRVS Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CRVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRVS Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

NUKZ
NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRVS vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CRVS) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRVSNUKZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.17

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

1.70

+1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.03

4.11

+2.92

CRVS vs. NUKZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRVS Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the NUKZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRVS and NUKZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRVS vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRVS drawdown since its inception was -96.97%, which is greater than NUKZ's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRVS and NUKZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRVSNUKZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.97%

-33.03%

-63.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.43%

-16.51%

-39.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.25%

-10.39%

-42.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.28%

-6.06%

-63.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.91%

6.80%

+19.11%

Volatility

CRVS vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison

Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CRVS) has a higher volatility of 23.12% compared to Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) at 11.24%. This indicates that CRVS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRVSNUKZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.12%

11.24%

+11.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

111.88%

23.34%

+88.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

180.64%

30.46%

+150.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

131.02%

32.94%

+98.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

111.13%

32.94%

+78.19%

Dividends

CRVS vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison

CRVS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%.


PositionTTM20252024
CRVS
Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF
0.85%0.91%0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRVS and NUKZ have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRVS has higher volatility (23.12%) compared to NUKZ (11.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRVS dropped -96.97% vs NUKZ's -33.03%.

CRVS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRVS and NUKZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer