PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRUX vs. REMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRUX vs. REMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX) and Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (REMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CRUX

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.14%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

REMC

1D
-0.48%
1M
3.98%
6M
9.20%
YTD
12.40%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRUX vs. REMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CRUX and REMC is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026

0.64

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRUX vs. REMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX) and Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (REMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CRUX vs. REMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRUX vs. REMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRUX drawdown since its inception was -1.85%, smaller than the maximum REMC drawdown of -6.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRUX and REMC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRUXREMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

-6.64%

+4.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-0.48%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.60%

-1.38%

+0.78%

Volatility

CRUX vs. REMC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRUXREMCDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.98%

12.07%

-8.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.98%

12.07%

-8.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.98%

12.07%

-8.09%

CRUX vs. REMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CRUX and REMC have an expense ratio of 0.32%.


Dividends

CRUX vs. REMC - Dividend Comparison

CRUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than REMC's 0.07% yield.


PositionTTM2025
CRUX
Columbia Core Bond ETF
1.40%0.00%
REMC
Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF
0.07%0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRUX and REMC have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.32% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CRUX and REMC have the same expense ratio: 0.32% per year.

CRUX has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 0.07% for REMC.

CRUX is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while REMC is Mid Cap Blend Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRUX and REMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer