CRUX vs. BIV

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CRUX (Columbia Core Bond ETF) and BIV (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. CRUX is actively managed, while BIV is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CRUX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BIV.

Performance

CRUX vs. BIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CRUX

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.01%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BIV

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -0.04%
• YTD: -0.02%
• 6M: -0.05%
• 1Y: 5.02%
• 3Y*: 4.34%
• 5Y*: 0.39%
• 10Y*: 1.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRUX vs. BIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF	0.02%
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF	-0.13%

Correlation

The correlation between CRUX and BIV is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2026	0.93

Return for Risk

CRUX vs. BIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIV

BIV Risk / Return Rank: 32
BIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
BIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
BIV Omega Ratio Rank: 32
BIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
BIV Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRUX vs. BIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRUX	BIV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.65	-0.62

Drawdowns

CRUX vs. BIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRUX drawdown since its inception was -1.85%, smaller than the maximum BIV drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRUX and BIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRUX	BIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	-18.95%	+17.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.18%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-6.07%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.74%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-18.95%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.58%	-1.82%	+1.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.61%	-3.39%	+2.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.04%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRUX	BIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.38%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.92%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.35%	4.06%	+0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.35%	6.40%	-2.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.35%	5.50%	-1.15%

CRUX vs. BIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRUX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than BIV's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRUX vs. BIV - Dividend Comparison

CRUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than BIV's 4.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIV Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF	4.21%	4.01%	3.79%	3.09%	2.41%	3.42%	2.95%	2.75%	2.88%	2.69%	3.01%	3.02%
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF	1.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRUX and BIV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, CRUX and BIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, CRUX or BIV?

On fees, BIV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRUX or BIV?

BIV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for CRUX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRUX or BIV?

BIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 1.06% for CRUX.

What is the main difference between CRUX and BIV?

They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CRUX and 0.03% for BIV.