CRUX vs. DDV
CRUX (Columbia Core Bond ETF) and DDV (Defined Duration 5 ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CRUX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DDV.
Performance
CRUX vs. DDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CRUX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDV
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 2.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRUX vs. DDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF | 0.12% |
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRUX and DDV is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRUX vs. DDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRUX vs. DDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRUX drawdown since its inception was -1.85%, roughly equal to the maximum DDV drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRUX and DDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRUX | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -1.92% | +0.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.02% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.60% | -0.35% | -0.25% |
Volatility
CRUX vs. DDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRUX | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.12% | 2.66% | +1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.12% | 2.66% | +1.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.12% | 2.66% | +1.46% |
CRUX vs. DDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRUX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than DDV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRUX vs. DDV - Dividend Comparison
CRUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than DDV's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF | 1.06% | 0.00% |
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 1.21% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRUX and DDV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for CRUX.
DDV has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 1.06% for CRUX.
They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and Discipline Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CRUX and 0.25% for DDV.
Find the right allocation for CRUX and DDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer