CRUX vs. CAFX
CRUX (Columbia Core Bond ETF) and CAFX (Congress Intermediate Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CRUX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CAFX.
Performance
CRUX vs. CAFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CRUX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAFX
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- 3.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRUX vs. CAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF | 0.18% |
CAFX Congress Intermediate Bond ETF | 0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRUX and CAFX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRUX vs. CAFX — Risk / Return Rank
CRUX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CAFX
CRUX vs. CAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX) and Congress Intermediate Bond ETF (CAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRUX | CAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.89 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.97 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRUX vs. CAFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRUX drawdown since its inception was -1.85%, smaller than the maximum CAFX drawdown of -2.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRUX and CAFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRUX | CAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -2.63% | +0.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -0.88% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.60% | -0.74% | +0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.68% | — |
Volatility
CRUX vs. CAFX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRUX | CAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.98% | 2.89% | +1.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.98% | 3.14% | +0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.98% | 3.14% | +0.84% |
CRUX vs. CAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRUX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than CAFX's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRUX vs. CAFX - Dividend Comparison
CRUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than CAFX's 4.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CAFX Congress Intermediate Bond ETF | 4.03% | 3.92% | 0.96% |
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRUX and CAFX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRUX is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRUX is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CAFX.
CAFX has the higher dividend yield at 4.03%, compared with 1.40% for CRUX.
They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and Congress. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CRUX and 0.35% for CAFX.
Find the right allocation for CRUX and CAFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer