CRUX vs. CAFX
CRUX (Columbia Core Bond ETF) and CAFX (Congress Intermediate Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CRUX charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CAFX.
Performance
CRUX vs. CAFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CRUX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAFX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- 3.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRUX vs. CAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF | 0.12% |
CAFX Congress Intermediate Bond ETF | 0.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRUX and CAFX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRUX vs. CAFX — Risk / Return Rank
CRUX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CAFX
CRUX vs. CAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX) and Congress Intermediate Bond ETF (CAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRUX | CAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.88 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.20 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRUX vs. CAFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRUX drawdown since its inception was -1.85%, smaller than the maximum CAFX drawdown of -2.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRUX and CAFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRUX | CAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.85% | -2.63% | +0.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -1.03% | +0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.60% | -0.74% | +0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.64% | — |
Volatility
CRUX vs. CAFX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRUX | CAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.80% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.12% | 2.91% | +1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.12% | 3.16% | +0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.12% | 3.16% | +0.96% |
CRUX vs. CAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRUX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than CAFX's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRUX vs. CAFX - Dividend Comparison
CRUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than CAFX's 4.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CAFX Congress Intermediate Bond ETF | 4.01% | 3.92% | 0.96% |
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRUX and CAFX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRUX is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRUX is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CAFX.
CAFX has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 1.06% for CRUX.
They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and Congress. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for CRUX and 0.35% for CAFX.
Find the right allocation for CRUX and CAFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer