CRSSX vs. LMSIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CRSSX (Catholic Responsible Investments Small-Cap Fund) and LMSIX (Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, CRSSX returned 14.55%/yr vs 21.49%/yr for LMSIX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. CRSSX charges 0.29%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for LMSIX.

Performance

CRSSX vs. LMSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catholic Responsible Investments Small-Cap Fund (CRSSX) and Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CRSSX having a 16.29% return and LMSIX slightly lower at 16.18%.

CRSSX

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 2.28%
• YTD: 16.29%
• 6M: 15.42%
• 1Y: 32.21%
• 3Y*: 14.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LMSIX

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 3.36%
• YTD: 16.18%
• 6M: 15.04%
• 1Y: 41.69%
• 3Y*: 21.49%
• 5Y*: 9.34%
• 10Y*: 11.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRSSX vs. LMSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CRSSX Catholic Responsible Investments Small-Cap Fund	16.29%	5.86%	8.16%	16.02%	-6.44%
LMSIX Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund	16.18%	20.19%	9.90%	18.80%	-4.14%

Correlation

The correlation between CRSSX and LMSIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022	0.96

The correlation between CRSSX and LMSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CRSSX vs. LMSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRSSX

CRSSX Risk / Return Rank: 57
CRSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
CRSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
CRSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
CRSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
CRSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

LMSIX

LMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 72
LMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
LMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
LMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
LMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
LMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRSSX vs. LMSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catholic Responsible Investments Small-Cap Fund (CRSSX) and Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRSSX	LMSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.96	2.39	-0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.84	3.31	-0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.41	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.02	4.76	-0.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.30	16.58	-3.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRSSX vs. LMSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRSSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the LMSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRSSX and LMSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRSSX	LMSIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.96	2.39	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.43	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.34	+0.07

Drawdowns

CRSSX vs. LMSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRSSX drawdown since its inception was -27.86%, smaller than the maximum LMSIX drawdown of -61.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSSX and LMSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRSSX	LMSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.86%	-61.16%	+33.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.60%	-9.22%	+0.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.86%	-26.80%	-1.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-50.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.09%	0.00%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.79%	-10.89%	+3.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.59%	2.64%	-0.05%

Volatility

CRSSX vs. LMSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Catholic Responsible Investments Small-Cap Fund (CRSSX) is 4.46%, while Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that CRSSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRSSX	LMSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.46%	5.31%	-0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.64%	12.90%	-1.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.58%	18.36%	-0.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.79%	21.95%	-0.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.79%	23.50%	-1.71%

CRSSX vs. LMSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRSSX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than LMSIX's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRSSX vs. LMSIX - Dividend Comparison

CRSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, less than LMSIX's 5.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRSSX Catholic Responsible Investments Small-Cap Fund	4.91%	5.64%	2.30%	1.36%	5.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LMSIX Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund	5.46%	6.35%	4.05%	3.70%	5.18%	21.64%	3.60%	1.48%	11.17%	8.85%	4.79%	7.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRSSX and LMSIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, CRSSX and LMSIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CRSSX or LMSIX?

LMSIX has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to CRSSX (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRSSX dropped -27.86% vs LMSIX's -61.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.