CRSH vs. XQQI

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) and XQQI (NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRSH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while XQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by NEOS. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.71, they often move in opposite directions. CRSH charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for XQQI.

Performance

CRSH vs. XQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CRSH

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: -8.50%
• YTD: 3.70%
• 6M: 5.11%
• 1Y: -18.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XQQI

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 7.87%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRSH vs. XQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	-2.70%
XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	17.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CRSH and XQQI is -0.71, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026	-0.71

Return for Risk

CRSH vs. XQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRSH

CRSH Risk / Return Rank: 5
CRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
CRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
CRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 5
CRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
CRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRSH vs. XQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRSH	XQQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.52	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.54	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.57	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.90	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRSH	XQQI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.70	2.86	-3.56

Drawdowns

CRSH vs. XQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRSH drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, which is greater than XQQI's maximum drawdown of -12.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSH and XQQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRSH	XQQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.68%	-12.53%	-51.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.20%	-0.96%	-58.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.15%	-2.04%	-41.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.20%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRSH	XQQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.19%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.67%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.71%	22.21%	+14.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.46%	22.21%	+25.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.46%	22.21%	+25.25%

CRSH vs. XQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRSH has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XQQI's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRSH vs. XQQI - Dividend Comparison

CRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 97.46%, more than XQQI's 7.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	97.46%	138.78%	94.25%
XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	7.91%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRSH and XQQI in my portfolio?

CRSH and XQQI have a correlation of -0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRSH or XQQI?

On fees, XQQI is cheaper at 0.98% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRSH or XQQI?

XQQI is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CRSH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRSH or XQQI?

CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 97.46%, compared with 7.91% for XQQI.

What is the main difference between CRSH and XQQI?

CRSH is categorized as Derivative Income, while XQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and NEOS. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CRSH and 0.98% for XQQI.