PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRSH vs. TSMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRSH vs. TSMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRSH achieves a 3.14% return, which is significantly lower than TSMY's 37.04% return.


CRSH

1D
-0.01%
1M
-8.50%
YTD
3.14%
6M
3.01%
1Y
-18.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSMY

1D
-1.37%
1M
7.48%
YTD
37.04%
6M
39.21%
1Y
92.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRSH vs. TSMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CRSH
YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
3.14%-13.40%-44.24%
TSMY
YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF
37.04%41.00%8.15%

Correlation

The correlation between CRSH and TSMY is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024

-0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRSH vs. TSMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRSH
CRSH Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
CRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

TSMY
TSMY Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
TSMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRSH vs. TSMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRSHTSMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.50

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.55

5.98

-6.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.86

22.18

-23.04

CRSH vs. TSMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRSH Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the TSMY Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRSH and TSMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRSHTSMYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.50

3.21

-3.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.71

1.56

-2.26

Drawdowns

CRSH vs. TSMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRSH drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, which is greater than TSMY's maximum drawdown of -31.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSH and TSMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRSHTSMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.68%

-31.15%

-32.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.45%

-15.50%

-17.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.42%

-1.37%

-58.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.11%

-5.51%

-37.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.14%

4.17%

+16.97%

Volatility

CRSH vs. TSMY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) has a higher volatility of 10.19% compared to YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY) at 9.52%. This indicates that CRSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRSHTSMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.19%

9.52%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.66%

22.68%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.72%

28.87%

+7.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.50%

33.22%

+14.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.50%

33.22%

+14.28%

CRSH vs. TSMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CRSH and TSMY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

CRSH vs. TSMY - Dividend Comparison

CRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 96.17%, more than TSMY's 52.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CRSH
YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
96.17%138.78%94.25%
TSMY
YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF
52.19%56.76%13.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRSH and TSMY have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRSH has higher volatility (10.19%) compared to TSMY (9.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRSH dropped -63.68% vs TSMY's -31.15%.

On 1-year performance, TSMY leads with 92.13% vs -18.24% for CRSH. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, TSMY has been the lower-risk option at 9.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSMY has performed better with a 92.13% return vs -18.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CRSH and TSMY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 96.17%, compared with 52.19% for TSMY.

TSMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRSH and TSMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer