CRSH vs. PLTY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) and PLTY (YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CRSH returned -18.24% vs 4.68% for PLTY. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

CRSH vs. PLTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRSH achieves a 3.14% return, which is significantly higher than PLTY's -13.54% return.

CRSH

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: -8.50%
• YTD: 3.14%
• 6M: 3.01%
• 1Y: -18.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PLTY

• 1D: -5.53%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: -13.54%
• 6M: -14.25%
• 1Y: 4.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRSH vs. PLTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	3.14%	-13.40%	-42.71%
PLTY YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF	-13.54%	78.06%	49.98%

Correlation

The correlation between CRSH and PLTY is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2024	-0.40

Return for Risk

CRSH vs. PLTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRSH

CRSH Risk / Return Rank: 4
CRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
CRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 5
CRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
CRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 5

PLTY

PLTY Risk / Return Rank: 10
PLTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
PLTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
PLTY Omega Ratio Rank: 12
PLTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
PLTY Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRSH vs. PLTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRSH	PLTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.50	0.11	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.51	0.44	-0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.06	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.55	0.14	-0.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.86	0.26	-1.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRSH vs. PLTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRSH Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the PLTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRSH and PLTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRSH	PLTY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.50	0.11	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.71	1.26	-1.97

Drawdowns

CRSH vs. PLTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRSH drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, which is greater than PLTY's maximum drawdown of -36.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSH and PLTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRSH	PLTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.68%	-36.61%	-27.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.45%	-34.41%	+0.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.42%	-25.02%	-34.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.11%	-12.77%	-30.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.14%	17.72%	+3.42%

Volatility

CRSH vs. PLTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) is 10.19%, while YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY) has a volatility of 15.13%. This indicates that CRSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRSH	PLTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.19%	15.13%	-4.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.66%	32.38%	-9.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.72%	43.50%	-6.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.50%	52.94%	-5.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.50%	52.94%	-5.44%

CRSH vs. PLTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CRSH and PLTY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

CRSH vs. PLTY - Dividend Comparison

CRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 96.17%, less than PLTY's 108.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	96.17%	138.78%	94.25%
PLTY YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF	108.80%	112.44%	7.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRSH and PLTY in my portfolio?

CRSH and PLTY have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRSH or PLTY?

PLTY has higher volatility (15.13%) compared to CRSH (10.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRSH dropped -63.68% vs PLTY's -36.61%.

Which ETF is better, CRSH or PLTY?

On 1-year performance, PLTY leads with 4.68% vs -18.24% for CRSH. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, CRSH has been the lower-risk option at 10.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CRSH or PLTY?

Over the 1-year period, PLTY has performed better with a 4.68% return vs -18.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRSH or PLTY?

CRSH and PLTY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRSH or PLTY?

PLTY has the higher dividend yield at 108.80%, compared with 96.17% for CRSH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PLTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.11 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.