PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRSH vs. PLTD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRSH vs. PLTD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares (PLTD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRSH achieves a 3.14% return, which is significantly lower than PLTD's 13.23% return.


CRSH

1D
-0.01%
1M
-8.50%
YTD
3.14%
6M
3.01%
1Y
-18.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PLTD

1D
6.63%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
13.23%
6M
11.78%
1Y
-22.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRSH vs. PLTD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CRSH
YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
3.14%-13.40%-1.54%
PLTD
Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares
13.23%-70.53%-5.12%

Correlation

The correlation between CRSH and PLTD is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2024

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRSH vs. PLTD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRSH
CRSH Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
CRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTD
PLTD Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PLTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTD Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTD Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRSH vs. PLTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares (PLTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRSHPLTDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

0.96

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.55

-0.50

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.86

-0.74

-0.13

CRSH vs. PLTD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRSH Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is comparable to the PLTD Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRSH and PLTD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRSHPLTDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.50

-0.43

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.71

-0.86

+0.15

Drawdowns

CRSH vs. PLTD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRSH drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, smaller than the maximum PLTD drawdown of -77.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSH and PLTD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRSHPLTDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.68%

-77.34%

+13.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.45%

-44.79%

+11.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.42%

-71.01%

+11.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.11%

-59.43%

+16.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.14%

30.14%

-9.00%

Volatility

CRSH vs. PLTD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) is 10.19%, while Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares (PLTD) has a volatility of 18.68%. This indicates that CRSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRSHPLTDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.19%

18.68%

-8.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.66%

38.02%

-15.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.72%

51.79%

-15.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.50%

63.73%

-16.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.50%

63.73%

-16.23%

CRSH vs. PLTD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRSH has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTD's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRSH vs. PLTD - Dividend Comparison

CRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 96.17%, more than PLTD's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CRSH
YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
96.17%138.78%94.25%
PLTD
Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares
3.26%5.17%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRSH and PLTD have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTD has higher volatility (18.68%) compared to CRSH (10.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRSH dropped -63.68% vs PLTD's -77.34%.

On 1-year performance, CRSH leads with -18.24% vs -22.19% for PLTD. On fees, PLTD is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, CRSH has been the lower-risk option at 10.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CRSH has performed better with a -18.24% return vs -22.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PLTD is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CRSH.

CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 96.17%, compared with 3.26% for PLTD.

CRSH is categorized as Derivative Income, while PLTD is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CRSH and 0.98% for PLTD.

PLTD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.43 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRSH and PLTD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer