CRSH vs. PLTD

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) and PLTD (Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - CRSH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while PLTD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Palantir Technologies Inc. (-100%). CRSH is actively managed, while PLTD is passively managed. Over the past year, CRSH returned -7.68% vs 5.29% for PLTD. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRSH charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for PLTD.

Performance

CRSH vs. PLTD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares (PLTD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRSH achieves a 12.45% return, which is significantly lower than PLTD's 40.92% return.

CRSH

• 1D: 1.32%
• 1M: 9.65%
• YTD: 12.45%
• 6M: 19.65%
• 1Y: -7.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PLTD

• 1D: 3.03%
• 1M: 17.18%
• YTD: 40.92%
• 6M: 54.26%
• 1Y: 5.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRSH vs. PLTD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	12.45%	-13.40%	-4.00%
PLTD Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares	40.92%	-70.53%	-5.12%

Correlation

The correlation between CRSH and PLTD is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024	0.40

Return for Risk

CRSH vs. PLTD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRSH

CRSH Risk / Return Rank: 7
CRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
CRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
CRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 7
CRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
CRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 7

PLTD

PLTD Risk / Return Rank: 11
PLTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
PLTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
PLTD Omega Ratio Rank: 12
PLTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
PLTD Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRSH vs. PLTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares (PLTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRSH	PLTD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.22	0.10	-0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.07	0.54	-0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.06	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.23	0.14	-0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.35	0.22	-0.58

CRSH vs. PLTD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRSH Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the PLTD Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRSH and PLTD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CRSH vs. PLTD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRSH drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, smaller than the maximum PLTD drawdown of -77.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSH and PLTD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRSH	PLTD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.68%	-77.34%	+13.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.45%	-39.15%	+5.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.76%	-63.91%	+8.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.42%	-59.60%	+16.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.71%	23.83%	-2.12%

Volatility

CRSH vs. PLTD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) is 9.65%, while Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares (PLTD) has a volatility of 19.73%. This indicates that CRSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRSH	PLTD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.65%	19.73%	-10.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.38%	38.05%	-15.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.54%	51.69%	-16.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.24%	63.24%	-16.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.24%	63.24%	-16.00%

CRSH vs. PLTD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRSH has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTD's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRSH vs. PLTD - Dividend Comparison

CRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 82.03%, more than PLTD's 2.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	82.03%	138.78%	94.25%
PLTD Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares	2.49%	5.17%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRSH and PLTD in my portfolio?

CRSH and PLTD have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRSH or PLTD?

PLTD has higher volatility (19.73%) compared to CRSH (9.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRSH dropped -63.68% vs PLTD's -77.34%.

Which ETF is better, CRSH or PLTD?

On 1-year performance, PLTD leads with 5.29% vs -7.68% for CRSH. On fees, PLTD is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, CRSH has been the lower-risk option at 9.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CRSH or PLTD?

Over the 1-year period, PLTD has performed better with a 5.29% return vs -7.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRSH or PLTD?

PLTD is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CRSH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRSH or PLTD?

CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 82.03%, compared with 2.49% for PLTD.

What is the main difference between CRSH and PLTD?

CRSH is categorized as Derivative Income, while PLTD is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CRSH and 0.98% for PLTD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PLTD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.