CRSH vs. PLTD
CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) and PLTD (Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - CRSH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while PLTD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Palantir Technologies Inc. (-100%). CRSH is actively managed, while PLTD is passively managed. Over the past year, CRSH returned -18.24% vs -22.19% for PLTD. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRSH charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for PLTD.
Performance
CRSH vs. PLTD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRSH achieves a 3.14% return, which is significantly lower than PLTD's 13.23% return.
CRSH
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -8.50%
- YTD
- 3.14%
- 6M
- 3.01%
- 1Y
- -18.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTD
- 1D
- 6.63%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 13.23%
- 6M
- 11.78%
- 1Y
- -22.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRSH vs. PLTD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 3.14% | -13.40% | -1.54% |
PLTD Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares | 13.23% | -70.53% | -5.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRSH and PLTD is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2024 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRSH vs. PLTD — Risk / Return Rank
CRSH
PLTD
CRSH vs. PLTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares (PLTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRSH | PLTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.96 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | -0.50 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | -0.74 | -0.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRSH | PLTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | -0.43 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.71 | -0.86 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
CRSH vs. PLTD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRSH drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, smaller than the maximum PLTD drawdown of -77.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSH and PLTD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRSH | PLTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.68% | -77.34% | +13.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.45% | -44.79% | +11.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.42% | -71.01% | +11.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.11% | -59.43% | +16.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.14% | 30.14% | -9.00% |
Volatility
CRSH vs. PLTD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) is 10.19%, while Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares (PLTD) has a volatility of 18.68%. This indicates that CRSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRSH | PLTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.19% | 18.68% | -8.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.66% | 38.02% | -15.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.72% | 51.79% | -15.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.50% | 63.73% | -16.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.50% | 63.73% | -16.23% |
CRSH vs. PLTD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRSH has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTD's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRSH vs. PLTD - Dividend Comparison
CRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 96.17%, more than PLTD's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 96.17% | 138.78% | 94.25% |
PLTD Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares | 3.26% | 5.17% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRSH and PLTD have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTD has higher volatility (18.68%) compared to CRSH (10.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRSH dropped -63.68% vs PLTD's -77.34%.
On 1-year performance, CRSH leads with -18.24% vs -22.19% for PLTD. On fees, PLTD is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, CRSH has been the lower-risk option at 10.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CRSH has performed better with a -18.24% return vs -22.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PLTD is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CRSH.
CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 96.17%, compared with 3.26% for PLTD.
CRSH is categorized as Derivative Income, while PLTD is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CRSH and 0.98% for PLTD.
PLTD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.43 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRSH and PLTD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer