CRSH vs. OMAH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CRSH returned -18.24% vs 11.44% for OMAH. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. CRSH charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

CRSH vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRSH achieves a 3.14% return, which is significantly lower than OMAH's 4.56% return.

CRSH

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: -8.50%
• YTD: 3.14%
• 6M: 3.01%
• 1Y: -18.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 4.56%
• 6M: 4.00%
• 1Y: 11.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRSH vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	3.14%	-34.04%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	4.56%	6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between CRSH and OMAH is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025	-0.27

The correlation between CRSH and OMAH shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (all time) to -0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CRSH vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRSH

CRSH Risk / Return Rank: 4
CRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
CRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 5
CRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
CRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 5

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 49
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 37
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRSH vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRSH	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.50	1.43	-1.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.51	2.02	-2.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.25	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.55	3.82	-4.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.86	9.48	-10.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRSH vs. OMAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRSH Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the OMAH Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRSH and OMAH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRSH	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.50	1.43	-1.93
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.71	0.70	-1.41

Drawdowns

CRSH vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRSH drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSH and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRSH	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.68%	-11.83%	-51.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.45%	-3.00%	-30.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.42%	-2.65%	-56.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.11%	-1.26%	-41.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.14%	1.21%	+19.93%

Volatility

CRSH vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) has a higher volatility of 10.19% compared to VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) at 1.93%. This indicates that CRSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRSH	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.19%	1.93%	+8.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.66%	5.49%	+17.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.72%	8.05%	+28.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.50%	13.21%	+34.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.50%	13.21%	+34.29%

CRSH vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRSH has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRSH vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

CRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 96.17%, more than OMAH's 15.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CRSH YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF	96.17%	138.78%	94.25%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	15.44%	12.86%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRSH and OMAH in my portfolio?

CRSH and OMAH have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRSH or OMAH?

CRSH has higher volatility (10.19%) compared to OMAH (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRSH dropped -63.68% vs OMAH's -11.83%.

Which ETF is better, CRSH or OMAH?

On 1-year performance, OMAH leads with 11.44% vs -18.24% for CRSH. On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, OMAH has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CRSH or OMAH?

Over the 1-year period, OMAH has performed better with a 11.44% return vs -18.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRSH or OMAH?

OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CRSH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRSH or OMAH?

CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 96.17%, compared with 15.44% for OMAH.

What is the main difference between CRSH and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CRSH and 0.95% for OMAH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OMAH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.