PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRSH vs. CHPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRSH vs. CHPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRSH achieves a 21.72% return, which is significantly lower than CHPY's 66.63% return.


CRSH

1D
-1.60%
1M
13.05%
6M
14.20%
YTD
21.72%
1Y
-7.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-26.35%

CHPY

1D
6.34%
1M
-4.73%
6M
50.63%
YTD
66.63%
1Y
105.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
105.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$49.15M$53.66M$60.73M
$457.04K$338.01K$365.84K

CRSH vs. CHPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CRSH and CHPY is -0.51, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

-0.52

The correlation between CRSH and CHPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.52 to -0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRSH vs. CHPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CRSH
CRSH Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
CRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
CRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

CHPY
CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CRSH vs. CHPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRSHCHPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.43

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.26

3.82

-4.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.41

17.31

-17.72

CRSH vs. CHPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRSH Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the CHPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRSH and CHPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRSH vs. CHPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRSH drawdown since its inception was -63.68%, which is greater than CHPY's maximum drawdown of -27.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRSH and CHPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRSHCHPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.68%

-27.64%

-36.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.50%

-27.64%

-2.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.11%

-15.14%

-36.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.01%

-3.12%

-40.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.37%

6.09%

+13.28%

Volatility

CRSH vs. CHPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) is 12.40%, while YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) has a volatility of 18.09%. This indicates that CRSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRSHCHPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.40%

18.09%

-5.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.58%

34.38%

-7.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.86%

38.64%

-1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.45%

39.38%

+8.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.45%

39.38%

+8.07%

CRSH vs. CHPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CRSH and CHPY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

CRSH vs. CHPY - Dividend Comparison

CRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 78.07%, more than CHPY's 36.11% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRSH and CHPY have a correlation of -0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHPY has higher volatility (18.09%) compared to CRSH (12.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRSH dropped -63.68% vs CHPY's -27.64%.

On 1-year performance, CHPY leads with 105.03% vs -7.97% for CRSH. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, CRSH has been the lower-risk option at 12.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CHPY has performed better with a 105.03% return vs -7.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CRSH and CHPY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

CRSH has the higher dividend yield at 78.07%, compared with 36.11% for CHPY.

CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRSH and CHPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer