CRS vs. XSB.TO
CRS (Carpenter Technology Corporation) is a stock, while XSB.TO (iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF) is Short-Term Bond fund tracking the FTSE Canada Short Term Overall Bond Index. Over the past 10 years, CRS returned 34.84%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for XSB.TO. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CRS vs. XSB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CRS is traded in USD, while XSB.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XSB.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRS achieves a 86.47% return, which is significantly higher than XSB.TO's -1.94% return. Over the past 10 years, CRS has outperformed XSB.TO with an annualized return of 34.84%, while XSB.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 0.99% annualized return.
CRS
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- 35.09%
- YTD
- 86.47%
- 6M
- 79.45%
- 1Y
- 131.77%
- 3Y*
- 125.83%
- 5Y*
- 72.99%
- 10Y*
- 34.84%
XSB.TO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -2.16%
- YTD
- -1.94%
- 6M
- -1.24%
- 1Y
- -0.10%
- 3Y*
- 2.55%
- 5Y*
- -0.59%
- 10Y*
- 0.99%
CRS vs. XSB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation | 86.47% | 86.23% | 141.72% | 94.48% | 29.50% | 2.66% | -39.44% | 42.12% | -29.16% | 43.40% |
XSB.TO iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF | -1.94% | 8.66% | -2.39% | 7.22% | -9.76% | -1.06% | 7.75% | 7.64% | -6.28% | 7.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRS and XSB.TO is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2006 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRS vs. XSB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CRS
XSB.TO
CRS vs. XSB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) and iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRS | XSB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.00 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.08 | 0.00 | +7.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.67 | 0.01 | +16.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRS vs. XSB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRS drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, which is greater than XSB.TO's maximum drawdown of -28.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRS and XSB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRS | XSB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.68% | -28.27% | -56.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.08% | -3.82% | -15.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.74% | -7.05% | -21.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.86% | -16.64% | -25.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.70% | -18.49% | -56.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -9.49% | +9.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.22% | -11.09% | -16.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.09% | 1.49% | +6.60% |
Volatility
CRS vs. XSB.TO - Volatility Comparison
Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) has a higher volatility of 10.47% compared to iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSB.TO) at 1.22%. This indicates that CRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRS | XSB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.47% | 1.22% | +9.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.61% | 3.70% | +29.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.34% | 4.72% | +43.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.61% | 6.83% | +39.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.89% | 7.24% | +41.65% |
Dividends
CRS vs. XSB.TO - Dividend Comparison
CRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than XSB.TO's 3.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation | 0.14% | 0.25% | 0.47% | 1.13% | 2.17% | 2.74% | 2.75% | 1.61% | 2.13% | 1.41% | 1.99% | 2.38% |
XSB.TO iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF | 3.10% | 3.15% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 2.28% | 2.05% | 2.21% | 2.39% | 2.39% | 2.36% | 2.36% | 2.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRS and XSB.TO have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CRS and XSB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer