CRS vs. TSLA
CRS (Carpenter Technology Corporation) and TSLA (Tesla, Inc.) are both stocks. CRS operates in Metal Fabrication (Industrials), while TSLA operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, CRS returned 33.20%/yr vs 39.56%/yr for TSLA. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CRS vs. TSLA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRS achieves a 58.69% return, which is significantly higher than TSLA's -9.07% return. Over the past 10 years, CRS has underperformed TSLA with an annualized return of 33.20%, while TSLA has yielded a comparatively higher 39.56% annualized return.
CRS
- 1D
- 3.20%
- 1M
- 16.65%
- YTD
- 58.69%
- 6M
- 62.07%
- 1Y
- 101.19%
- 3Y*
- 115.41%
- 5Y*
- 63.76%
- 10Y*
- 33.20%
TSLA
- 1D
- 4.59%
- 1M
- -4.53%
- YTD
- -9.07%
- 6M
- -6.97%
- 1Y
- 38.56%
- 3Y*
- 18.72%
- 5Y*
- 15.43%
- 10Y*
- 39.56%
CRS vs. TSLA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation | 58.69% | 86.23% | 141.72% | 94.48% | 29.50% | 2.66% | -39.44% | 42.12% | -29.16% | 43.40% |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | -9.07% | 11.36% | 62.52% | 101.72% | -65.03% | 49.76% | 743.44% | 25.70% | 6.89% | 45.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRS and TSLA is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2010 | 0.29 |
Fundamentals
CRS:
$25.10B
TSLA:
$1.45T
CRS:
$9.51
TSLA:
$1.10
CRS:
52.50
TSLA:
372.50
CRS:
0.04
TSLA:
45.57
CRS:
8.30
TSLA:
14.75
CRS:
12.14
TSLA:
17.20
CRS:
$3.03B
TSLA:
$97.88B
CRS:
$900.50M
TSLA:
$18.66B
CRS:
$745.50M
TSLA:
$10.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRS vs. TSLA — Risk / Return Rank
CRS
TSLA
CRS vs. TSLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRS | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.17 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.33 | 1.29 | +4.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.55 | 3.01 | +9.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRS | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 0.87 | +1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.38 | 0.26 | +1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.67 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.73 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
CRS vs. TSLA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRS drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, which is greater than TSLA's maximum drawdown of -73.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRS and TSLA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRS | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.68% | -73.63% | -11.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.08% | -29.93% | +10.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.74% | -53.77% | +25.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.86% | -73.63% | +31.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.70% | -73.63% | -1.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -16.52% | +16.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.25% | -22.73% | -4.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.09% | 12.84% | -4.75% |
Volatility
CRS vs. TSLA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) is 11.63%, while Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) has a volatility of 14.26%. This indicates that CRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRS | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.63% | 14.26% | -2.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.18% | 28.15% | +5.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.75% | 44.60% | +3.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.58% | 58.92% | -12.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.83% | 59.14% | -10.31% |
Dividends
CRS vs. TSLA - Dividend Comparison
CRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, while TSLA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation | 0.16% | 0.25% | 0.47% | 1.13% | 2.17% | 2.74% | 2.75% | 1.61% | 2.13% | 1.41% | 1.99% | 2.38% |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CRS vs. TSLA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Carpenter Technology Corporation and Tesla, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CRS vs. TSLA - Profitability Comparison
CRS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported a gross profit of 251.80M and revenue of 811.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.0%.
TSLA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.72B and revenue of 22.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.1%.
CRS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported an operating income of 186.50M and revenue of 811.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.0%.
TSLA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported an operating income of 941.00M and revenue of 22.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.
CRS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported a net income of 139.60M and revenue of 811.50M, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.
TSLA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a net income of 491.00M and revenue of 22.39B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRS and TSLA have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLA has higher volatility (14.26%) compared to CRS (11.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRS dropped -84.68% vs TSLA's -73.63%.
CRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRS and TSLA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer