CRQSX vs. DMB
CRQSX (Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund) and DMB (Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, CRQSX returned 22.35%/yr vs 4.78%/yr for DMB. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRQSX charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for DMB.
Performance
CRQSX vs. DMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRQSX achieves a 11.49% return, which is significantly higher than DMB's 1.36% return.
CRQSX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- YTD
- 11.49%
- 6M
- 10.87%
- 1Y
- 27.66%
- 3Y*
- 22.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DMB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- YTD
- 1.36%
- 6M
- 4.03%
- 1Y
- 14.71%
- 3Y*
- 4.78%
- 5Y*
- -1.78%
- 10Y*
- 2.14%
CRQSX vs. DMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRQSX Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund | 11.49% | 16.83% | 24.70% | 27.55% | -11.69% |
DMB Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund | 1.36% | 10.69% | 3.87% | 2.42% | -18.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRQSX and DMB is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRQSX vs. DMB — Risk / Return Rank
CRQSX
DMB
CRQSX vs. DMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund (CRQSX) and Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund (DMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRQSX | DMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.32 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | 1.85 | +1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.36 | 6.66 | +7.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRQSX | DMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 1.63 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.17 | +0.67 |
Drawdowns
CRQSX vs. DMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRQSX drawdown since its inception was -22.96%, smaller than the maximum DMB drawdown of -40.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRQSX and DMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRQSX | DMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.96% | -40.15% | +17.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.71% | -8.00% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.95% | -22.06% | +3.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -19.52% | +19.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.26% | -14.29% | +9.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 2.21% | -0.32% |
Volatility
CRQSX vs. DMB - Volatility Comparison
Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund (CRQSX) and Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund (DMB) have volatilities of 2.87% and 2.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRQSX | DMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 2.77% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.04% | 7.10% | +1.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.93% | 9.06% | +2.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.83% | 14.66% | +3.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.83% | 15.20% | +2.63% |
CRQSX vs. DMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRQSX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than DMB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CRQSX vs. DMB - Dividend Comparison
CRQSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, less than DMB's 4.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRQSX Catholic Responsible Investments Equity Index Fund | 3.31% | 3.66% | 2.09% | 1.34% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DMB Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund | 4.51% | 3.93% | 3.48% | 4.46% | 5.80% | 4.42% | 4.54% | 4.36% | 5.36% | 4.89% | 5.97% | 6.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRQSX and DMB have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRQSX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to DMB (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRQSX dropped -22.96% vs DMB's -40.15%.
CRQSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRQSX and DMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer