DMB vs. DHF
Compare and contrast key facts about Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund (DMB) and Dimensional High Yield Fund (DHF).
DMB is managed by Dimensional Fund Advisors. It was launched on Jan 1, 2013. DHF is managed by Dimensional Fund Advisors. It was launched on Jan 1, 2013.
Performance
DMB vs. DHF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DMB vs. DHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMB Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund | -2.99% | 10.69% | 3.87% | 2.42% | -23.23% | 7.04% | 0.75% | 28.84% | -3.89% | 11.52% |
DHF Dimensional High Yield Fund | -0.19% | 5.67% | 21.12% | 15.00% | -22.70% | 10.35% | 6.46% | 24.68% | -11.11% | 8.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DMB achieves a -2.99% return, which is significantly lower than DHF's -0.19% return. Over the past 10 years, DMB has underperformed DHF with an annualized return of 2.41%, while DHF has yielded a comparatively higher 6.48% annualized return.
DMB
- 1D
- 2.13%
- 1M
- -4.76%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 4.25%
- 3Y*
- 0.82%
- 5Y*
- -1.75%
- 10Y*
- 2.41%
DHF
- 1D
- 4.27%
- 1M
- -1.28%
- YTD
- -0.19%
- 6M
- -1.76%
- 1Y
- 4.04%
- 3Y*
- 13.00%
- 5Y*
- 3.57%
- 10Y*
- 6.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DMB vs. DHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DMB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than DHF's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
DMB vs. DHF — Risk / Return Rank
DMB
DHF
DMB vs. DHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund (DMB) and Dimensional High Yield Fund (DHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DMB | DHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.43 | 0.28 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.62 | 0.47 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.07 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 0.48 | +0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.31 | 1.60 | -0.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DMB | DHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | 0.28 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | 0.23 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 0.37 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between DMB and DHF is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DMB vs. DHF - Dividend Comparison
DMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, less than DHF's 8.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMB Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund | 4.44% | 3.93% | 3.48% | 4.46% | 5.80% | 4.42% | 4.54% | 4.36% | 5.36% | 4.89% | 5.97% | 6.06% |
DHF Dimensional High Yield Fund | 8.61% | 8.47% | 8.14% | 7.86% | 10.12% | 8.24% | 8.60% | 8.52% | 10.41% | 8.98% | 9.76% | 11.30% |
Drawdowns
DMB vs. DHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DMB drawdown since its inception was -40.15%, smaller than the maximum DHF drawdown of -71.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMB and DHF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DMB | DHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.15% | -71.32% | +31.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.64% | -9.84% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.15% | -37.82% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.15% | -42.94% | +2.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.98% | -4.35% | -18.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.21% | -23.15% | +8.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.70% | 3.04% | +0.66% |
Volatility
DMB vs. DHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund (DMB) is 3.71%, while Dimensional High Yield Fund (DHF) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that DMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DMB | DHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 6.29% | -2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.39% | 9.45% | -3.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.06% | 14.65% | -4.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.59% | 15.72% | -1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.16% | 17.75% | -2.59% |