DMB vs. DHF
DMB (Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund) and DHF (Dimensional High Yield Fund) are both mutual funds - DMB is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Dimensional, while DHF is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Dimensional. Over the past 10 years, DMB returned 1.59%/yr vs 5.12%/yr for DHF. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DMB charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for DHF.
Performance
DMB vs. DHF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DMB achieves a -1.46% return, which is significantly lower than DHF's -1.04% return. Over the past 10 years, DMB has underperformed DHF with an annualized return of 1.59%, while DHF has yielded a comparatively higher 5.12% annualized return.
DMB
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -4.45%
- 6M
- -3.07%
- YTD
- -1.46%
- 1Y
- 10.24%
- 3Y*
- 0.71%
- 5Y*
- -3.00%
- 10Y*
- 1.59%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.28%
DHF
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -2.18%
- 6M
- -3.76%
- YTD
- -1.04%
- 1Y
- -0.51%
- 3Y*
- 10.31%
- 5Y*
- 0.44%
- 10Y*
- 5.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.91%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $832.38K | $682.80K | $613.20K | |
| $551.04K | $643.10K | $567.43K |
DMB vs. DHF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMB Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund | -1.46% | 10.69% | 3.87% | 2.42% | -23.23% | 7.04% | 0.75% | 28.84% | -3.89% | 11.52% |
DHF Dimensional High Yield Fund | -1.04% | 5.67% | 21.12% | 15.00% | -22.70% | 10.35% | 6.46% | 24.68% | -11.11% | 8.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between DMB and DHF is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2013 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DMB vs. DHF — Risk / Return Rank
DMB
DHF
DMB vs. DHF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund (DMB) and Dimensional High Yield Fund (DHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DMB | DHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.01 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | -0.01 | +1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.82 | -0.03 | +4.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DMB vs. DHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DMB drawdown since its inception was -40.15%, smaller than the maximum DHF drawdown of -71.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DMB and DHF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DMB | DHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.15% | -71.32% | +31.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.00% | -8.66% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.13% | -11.81% | -6.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.15% | -34.99% | -5.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.15% | -42.94% | +2.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.76% | -5.16% | -16.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.34% | -22.91% | +8.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 3.38% | -1.18% |
Volatility
DMB vs. DHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund (DMB) is 2.27%, while Dimensional High Yield Fund (DHF) has a volatility of 2.90%. This indicates that DMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DMB | DHF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.27% | 2.90% | -0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.97% | 9.39% | -2.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.16% | 11.90% | -2.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.61% | 14.97% | -0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.12% | 17.72% | -2.60% |
DMB vs. DHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DMB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than DHF's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DMB vs. DHF - Dividend Comparison
DMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, less than DHF's 8.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHF Dimensional High Yield Fund | 8.94% | 8.47% | 8.14% | 7.86% | 10.12% | 8.24% | 8.60% | 8.52% | 10.41% | 8.98% | 9.76% | 11.30% |
DMB Dimensional Multi-Blend Fund | 4.90% | 3.93% | 3.48% | 4.46% | 5.80% | 4.42% | 4.54% | 4.36% | 5.36% | 4.89% | 5.97% | 6.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DMB and DHF have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DHF has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to DMB (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DMB dropped -40.15% vs DHF's -71.32%.
DMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DMB and DHF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer