CRPT vs. ROBT

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CRPT (First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF) and ROBT (First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF) are both Technology Equities funds from First Trust. CRPT is actively managed, while ROBT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CRPT returned 29.08%/yr vs 7.18%/yr for ROBT. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CRPT charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ROBT.

Performance

CRPT vs. ROBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF (CRPT) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRPT achieves a -23.98% return, which is significantly lower than ROBT's 3.49% return.

CRPT

• 1D: -4.12%
• 1M: -21.36%
• YTD: -23.98%
• 6M: -28.82%
• 1Y: -48.39%
• 3Y*: 29.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ROBT

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -5.82%
• YTD: 3.49%
• 6M: 1.51%
• 1Y: 13.89%
• 3Y*: 7.18%
• 5Y*: -0.13%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRPT vs. ROBT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CRPT First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF	-23.98%	-9.54%	75.29%	193.86%	-80.84%	-9.59%
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF	3.49%	15.16%	-0.41%	27.77%	-34.94%	0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between CRPT and ROBT is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2021	0.67

The correlation between CRPT and ROBT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

CRPT vs. ROBT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CRPT	ROBT
Financial Services	70.1%	1.5%
Technology	15.6%	58.6%
Consumer Cyclical	14.3%	6.4%
Communication Services	4.3%	3.8%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	1.3%
Energy	-	1.3%
Healthcare	-	6.9%
Industrials	-	20.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CRPT vs. ROBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRPT

CRPT Risk / Return Rank: 3
CRPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CRPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CRPT Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CRPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CRPT Martin Ratio Rank: 2

ROBT

ROBT Risk / Return Rank: 18
ROBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
ROBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
ROBT Omega Ratio Rank: 18
ROBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
ROBT Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRPT vs. ROBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF (CRPT) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRPT	ROBT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.83	0.57	-1.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.16	0.92	-2.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	1.11	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.86	0.64	-1.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.42	1.78	-3.20

CRPT vs. ROBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRPT Sharpe Ratio is -0.83, which is lower than the ROBT Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRPT and ROBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CRPT vs. ROBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRPT drawdown since its inception was -88.34%, which is greater than ROBT's maximum drawdown of -44.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRPT and ROBT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRPT	ROBT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.34%	-44.47%	-43.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.46%	-21.66%	-34.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-56.46%	-27.68%	-28.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.88%	-10.95%	-44.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.56%	-15.91%	-36.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	34.19%	7.81%	+26.38%

Volatility

CRPT vs. ROBT - Volatility Comparison

First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF (CRPT) has a higher volatility of 19.31% compared to First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) at 10.39%. This indicates that CRPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRPT	ROBT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.31%	10.39%	+8.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.13%	19.22%	+27.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.61%	24.65%	+33.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.71%	25.48%	+47.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.71%	25.58%	+47.13%

CRPT vs. ROBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRPT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ROBT's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRPT vs. ROBT - Dividend Comparison

CRPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than ROBT's 0.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CRPT First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF	0.99%	0.75%	1.84%	0.00%	0.03%	1.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF	0.02%	0.00%	0.68%	0.23%	0.35%	0.06%	0.17%	0.42%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRPT and ROBT in my portfolio?

CRPT and ROBT have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CRPT or ROBT?

CRPT has higher volatility (19.31%) compared to ROBT (10.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRPT dropped -88.34% vs ROBT's -44.47%.

Which ETF is better, CRPT or ROBT?

On 3-year performance, CRPT leads with 29.08% vs 7.18% for ROBT. On fees, ROBT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ROBT has been the lower-risk option at 10.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CRPT or ROBT?

Over the 3-year period, CRPT has performed better with a 29.08% return vs 7.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRPT or ROBT?

ROBT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for CRPT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRPT or ROBT?

CRPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.02% for ROBT.

What is the main difference between CRPT and ROBT?

Their fees differ too: 0.85% for CRPT and 0.65% for ROBT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.