CRPT vs. RBIL
CRPT (First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CRPT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. CRPT is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. Over the past year, CRPT returned -34.00% vs 4.60% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. CRPT charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
CRPT vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRPT achieves a -12.33% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.67% return.
CRPT
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -16.12%
- YTD
- -12.33%
- 6M
- -24.87%
- 1Y
- -34.00%
- 3Y*
- 39.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RBIL
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 2.67%
- 6M
- 2.74%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRPT vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CRPT First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF | -12.33% | 6.39% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.67% | 2.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRPT and RBIL is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRPT vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
CRPT
RBIL
CRPT vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF (CRPT) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRPT | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -8.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 2.41 | -1.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 17.11 | -17.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | 71.11 | -72.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRPT | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.59 | 5.06 | -5.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 4.24 | -4.34 |
Drawdowns
CRPT vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRPT drawdown since its inception was -88.34%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRPT and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRPT | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.34% | -0.50% | -87.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.46% | -0.27% | -56.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.12% | -0.03% | -49.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.64% | -0.06% | -52.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.26% | 0.06% | +32.20% |
Volatility
CRPT vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF (CRPT) has a higher volatility of 13.14% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.30%. This indicates that CRPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRPT | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.14% | 0.30% | +12.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.70% | 0.79% | +44.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.39% | 0.92% | +56.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.72% | 1.05% | +71.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.72% | 1.05% | +71.67% |
CRPT vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRPT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRPT vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
CRPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than RBIL's 4.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRPT First Trust SkyBridge Crypto Industry & Digital Economy ETF | 0.86% | 0.75% | 1.84% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 1.16% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.60% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRPT and RBIL have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRPT has higher volatility (13.14%) compared to RBIL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRPT dropped -88.34% vs RBIL's -0.50%.
On 1-year performance, RBIL leads with 4.60% vs -34.00% for CRPT. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RBIL has performed better with a 4.60% return vs -34.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for CRPT.
RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 0.86% for CRPT.
CRPT is categorized as Technology Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for CRPT and 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.06 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRPT and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer