CRPS.L vs. CHRG.L
CRPS.L (iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) and CHRG.L (WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - CRPS.L is a Global Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD, while CHRG.L is a Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CRPS.L returned 1.09%/yr vs 3.33%/yr for CHRG.L. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRPS.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for CHRG.L.
Performance
CRPS.L vs. CHRG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CRPS.L is traded in GBP, while CHRG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CHRG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRPS.L achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly lower than CHRG.L's 20.30% return.
CRPS.L
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 1.89%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 6M
- 2.38%
- 1Y
- 6.64%
- 3Y*
- 4.19%
- 5Y*
- 1.09%
- 10Y*
- 2.16%
CHRG.L
- 1D
- -2.25%
- 1M
- -12.06%
- YTD
- 20.30%
- 6M
- 18.70%
- 1Y
- 77.68%
- 3Y*
- 11.85%
- 5Y*
- 3.33%
- 10Y*
- —
CRPS.L vs. CHRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRPS.L iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 1.79% | 2.45% | 2.70% | 2.88% | -5.91% | -2.67% | 3.87% |
CHRG.L WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 20.30% | 44.29% | -11.91% | -9.67% | -19.10% | 14.89% | 12,965.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRPS.L and CHRG.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2020 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRPS.L vs. CHRG.L — Risk / Return Rank
CRPS.L
CHRG.L
CRPS.L vs. CHRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (CRPS.L) and WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRPS.L | CHRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.42 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 5.79 | -3.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.32 | 16.64 | -12.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRPS.L vs. CHRG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRPS.L drawdown since its inception was -37.94%, smaller than the maximum CHRG.L drawdown of -52.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRPS.L and CHRG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRPS.L | CHRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.94% | -52.64% | +14.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.40% | -13.35% | +9.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.77% | -39.93% | +34.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.27% | -52.64% | +40.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.26% | -13.10% | +10.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.88% | -21.14% | +5.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 4.65% | -3.12% |
Volatility
CRPS.L vs. CHRG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (CRPS.L) is 1.42%, while WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L) has a volatility of 8.80%. This indicates that CRPS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRPS.L | CHRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | 8.80% | -7.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.60% | 20.24% | -16.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.97% | 28.44% | -23.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.02% | 26.23% | -19.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.02% | 3,147.00% | -3,138.98% |
CRPS.L vs. CHRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRPS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CHRG.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
CRPS.L vs. CHRG.L - Dividend Comparison
CRPS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, while CHRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRG.L WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CRPS.L iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 4.17% | 4.12% | 3.87% | 3.34% | 2.55% | 2.07% | 2.42% | 2.75% | 2.56% | 2.61% | 2.45% | 2.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CRPS.L and CHRG.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRPS.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRPS.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CHRG.L.
CRPS.L is categorized as Global Corporate Bonds, while CHRG.L is Lithium & Battery Metals. CRPS.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD, while CHRG.L tracks WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CRPS.L and 0.40% for CHRG.L.
Find the right allocation for CRPS.L and CHRG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer