CRPS.L vs. SLQD

In the year-to-date period, CRPS.L achieves a -3.74% return, which is significantly lower than SLQD's 2.33% return. Over the past 10 years, CRPS.L has outperformed SLQD with an annualized return of 3.30%, while SLQD has yielded a comparatively lower 2.37% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CRPS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SLQD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (CRPS.L) and iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CRPS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the SLQD Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRPS.L and SLQD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CRPS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than SLQD's 3.87% yield.

The maximum CRPS.L drawdown since its inception was -15.38%, which is greater than SLQD's maximum drawdown of -12.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRPS.L and SLQD.

iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (CRPS.L) has a higher volatility of 1.65% compared to iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (SLQD) at 0.58%. This indicates that CRPS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.