PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRPS.L vs. AGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRPS.L vs. AGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (CRPS.L) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CRPS.L is traded in GBP, while AGG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AGG values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRPS.L achieves a -1.84% return, which is significantly lower than AGG's 0.82% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CRPS.L having a 2.45% annualized return and AGG not far behind at 2.41%.


CRPS.L

1D
0.23%
1M
0.97%
YTD
-1.84%
6M
-2.15%
1Y
1.82%
3Y*
1.73%
5Y*
0.28%
10Y*
2.45%

AGG

1D
0.00%
1M
1.09%
YTD
0.82%
6M
-0.06%
1Y
6.16%
3Y*
1.32%
5Y*
1.22%
10Y*
2.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRPS.L vs. AGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRPS.L
iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
-1.84%0.38%2.69%2.88%-5.90%-2.68%6.79%8.38%1.64%-0.97%
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
0.92%-0.44%3.08%0.37%-2.68%-0.84%4.32%4.33%6.03%-5.40%

Correlation

The correlation between CRPS.L and AGG is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2012

0.74

The correlation between CRPS.L and AGG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRPS.L vs. AGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRPS.L
CRPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CRPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
CRPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

AGG
AGG Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
AGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
AGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRPS.L vs. AGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (CRPS.L) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRPS.LAGGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.18

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

1.16

-0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.64

3.06

-2.42

CRPS.L vs. AGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRPS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the AGG Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRPS.L and AGG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRPS.LAGGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

1.00

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.14

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.25

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.51

-0.12

Drawdowns

CRPS.L vs. AGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRPS.L drawdown since its inception was -15.38%, smaller than the maximum AGG drawdown of -17.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRPS.L and AGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRPS.LAGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.38%

-17.60%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.02%

-5.31%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.77%

-8.64%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.26%

-14.70%

+2.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.38%

-17.60%

+2.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.65%

-9.62%

+1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.89%

-7.11%

+1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.01%

+0.29%

Volatility

CRPS.L vs. AGG - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (CRPS.L) and iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (AGG) have volatilities of 1.35% and 1.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRPS.LAGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

1.40%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.46%

4.74%

-0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.90%

6.22%

-0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.17%

8.61%

-1.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.49%

9.82%

-1.33%

CRPS.L vs. AGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRPS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than AGG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CRPS.L vs. AGG - Dividend Comparison

CRPS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
4.00%3.89%3.74%3.13%2.39%1.77%2.14%2.70%2.72%2.32%2.39%2.45%
CRPS.L
iShares Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%2.08%3.87%3.34%2.55%2.07%2.42%2.75%2.56%2.61%2.45%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRPS.L and AGG have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AGG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AGG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CRPS.L.

CRPS.L is categorized as Global Corporate Bonds, while AGG is Total Bond Market. CRPS.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD, while AGG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CRPS.L and 0.03% for AGG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRPS.L and AGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer