CRNX vs. AUPH
CRNX (Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and AUPH (Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Biotechnology industry within the Healthcare sector. Over the past 5 years, CRNX returned 15.37%/yr vs 5.58%/yr for AUPH. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CRNX vs. AUPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRNX achieves a -25.61% return, which is significantly lower than AUPH's 2.63% return.
CRNX
- 1D
- 4.65%
- 1M
- -15.02%
- YTD
- -25.61%
- 6M
- -26.97%
- 1Y
- 7.78%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 15.37%
- 10Y*
- —
AUPH
- 1D
- 4.47%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 6.92%
- 1Y
- 104.88%
- 3Y*
- 18.21%
- 5Y*
- 5.58%
- 10Y*
- 19.02%
CRNX vs. AUPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRNX Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | -25.61% | -8.96% | 43.70% | 94.43% | -35.59% | 101.35% | -43.76% | -16.34% | 22.36% |
AUPH Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. | 2.63% | 77.62% | -0.11% | 108.10% | -81.11% | 65.37% | -31.74% | 197.07% | 19.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRNX and AUPH is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018 | 0.32 |
Fundamentals
CRNX:
$3.60B
AUPH:
$2.25B
CRNX:
-$5.14
AUPH:
$2.15
CRNX:
211.69
AUPH:
7.62
CRNX:
2.81
AUPH:
3.97
CRNX:
$15.79M
AUPH:
$298.30M
CRNX:
$16.05M
AUPH:
$267.70M
CRNX:
-$531.75M
AUPH:
$153.45M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRNX vs. AUPH — Risk / Return Rank
CRNX
AUPH
CRNX vs. AUPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CRNX) and Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (AUPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRNX | AUPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.42 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 6.63 | -6.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.41 | 14.46 | -14.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRNX | AUPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | 2.33 | -2.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.08 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.17 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
CRNX vs. AUPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRNX drawdown since its inception was -68.70%, smaller than the maximum AUPH drawdown of -87.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRNX and AUPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRNX | AUPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.70% | -87.58% | +18.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.21% | -15.91% | -26.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.88% | -60.80% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.88% | -87.58% | +29.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -87.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.94% | -50.51% | +7.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.32% | -49.22% | +11.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.18% | 7.28% | +11.90% |
Volatility
CRNX vs. AUPH - Volatility Comparison
Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CRNX) has a higher volatility of 20.14% compared to Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (AUPH) at 11.59%. This indicates that CRNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUPH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRNX | AUPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.14% | 11.59% | +8.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.97% | 24.74% | +12.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.91% | 45.36% | +11.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.21% | 67.50% | -3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.11% | 73.99% | -8.88% |
Dividends
CRNX vs. AUPH - Dividend Comparison
Neither CRNX nor AUPH has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CRNX vs. AUPH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CRNX and AUPH have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRNX has higher volatility (20.14%) compared to AUPH (11.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRNX dropped -68.70% vs AUPH's -87.58%.
AUPH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRNX and AUPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer