AUPH vs. NXTC
AUPH (Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.) and NXTC (NextCure, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Biotechnology industry within the Healthcare sector. Over the past 5 years, AUPH returned 4.66%/yr vs -48.99%/yr for NXTC. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AUPH vs. NXTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUPH achieves a -1.76% return, which is significantly higher than NXTC's -77.80% return.
AUPH
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- YTD
- -1.76%
- 6M
- 5.10%
- 1Y
- 95.87%
- 3Y*
- 17.99%
- 5Y*
- 4.66%
- 10Y*
- 17.98%
NXTC
- 1D
- -7.35%
- 1M
- -64.69%
- YTD
- -77.80%
- 6M
- -73.83%
- 1Y
- -44.59%
- 3Y*
- -46.77%
- 5Y*
- -48.99%
- 10Y*
- —
AUPH vs. NXTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUPH Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. | -1.76% | 77.62% | -0.11% | 108.10% | -81.11% | 65.37% | -31.74% | 229.43% |
NXTC NextCure, Inc. | -77.80% | 53.37% | -32.37% | -19.15% | -76.50% | -44.95% | -80.65% | 183.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between AUPH and NXTC is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2019 | 0.24 |
Fundamentals
AUPH:
$2.16B
NXTC:
$16.50M
AUPH:
$2.15
NXTC:
-$15.85
AUPH:
3.80
NXTC:
0.62
AUPH:
$298.30M
NXTC:
$0.00
AUPH:
$267.70M
NXTC:
-$365.00K
AUPH:
$153.45M
NXTC:
-$54.25M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUPH vs. NXTC — Risk / Return Rank
AUPH
NXTC
AUPH vs. NXTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (AUPH) and NextCure, Inc. (NXTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AUPH | NXTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.02 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.06 | -0.57 | +6.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.22 | -1.61 | +14.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AUPH | NXTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | -0.38 | +2.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | -0.62 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | -0.37 | +0.54 |
Drawdowns
AUPH vs. NXTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUPH drawdown since its inception was -87.58%, smaller than the maximum NXTC drawdown of -99.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUPH and NXTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUPH | NXTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.58% | -99.72% | +12.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.91% | -77.93% | +62.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.80% | -89.46% | +28.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.58% | -97.12% | +9.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.63% | -99.72% | +47.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.22% | -86.61% | +37.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.28% | 27.66% | -20.38% |
Volatility
AUPH vs. NXTC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (AUPH) is 10.84%, while NextCure, Inc. (NXTC) has a volatility of 70.15%. This indicates that AUPH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NXTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AUPH | NXTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.84% | 70.15% | -59.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.40% | 87.61% | -63.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.17% | 117.57% | -72.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.49% | 78.91% | -11.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.99% | 125.32% | -51.33% |
Dividends
AUPH vs. NXTC - Dividend Comparison
Neither AUPH nor NXTC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
AUPH vs. NXTC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. and NextCure, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
AUPH and NXTC have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NXTC has higher volatility (70.15%) compared to AUPH (10.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUPH dropped -87.58% vs NXTC's -99.72%.
AUPH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AUPH and NXTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer