PortfoliosLab logo
AUPH vs. BMY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between AUPH and BMY is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

AUPH vs. BMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (AUPH) and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AUPH:

1.06

BMY:

0.83

Sortino Ratio

AUPH:

1.91

BMY:

1.38

Omega Ratio

AUPH:

1.21

BMY:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

AUPH:

0.57

BMY:

0.53

Martin Ratio

AUPH:

3.18

BMY:

2.67

Ulcer Index

AUPH:

15.18%

BMY:

9.42%

Daily Std Dev

AUPH:

43.56%

BMY:

31.39%

Max Drawdown

AUPH:

-87.58%

BMY:

-70.62%

Current Drawdown

AUPH:

-76.30%

BMY:

-33.83%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AUPH:

$1.08B

BMY:

$98.25B

EPS

AUPH:

$0.27

BMY:

$2.70

PE Ratio

AUPH:

29.59

BMY:

17.88

PEG Ratio

AUPH:

0.00

BMY:

2.26

PS Ratio

AUPH:

4.37

BMY:

2.06

PB Ratio

AUPH:

3.08

BMY:

5.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

AUPH:

$247.30M

BMY:

$47.64B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AUPH:

$218.23M

BMY:

$31.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

AUPH:

$54.34M

BMY:

$16.18B

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AUPH having a -12.69% return and BMY slightly lower at -12.76%. Over the past 10 years, AUPH has outperformed BMY with an annualized return of 8.43%, while BMY has yielded a comparatively lower 0.11% annualized return.


AUPH

YTD

-12.69%

1M

-4.85%

6M

-11.51%

1Y

45.72%

3Y*

-11.42%

5Y*

-13.15%

10Y*

8.43%

BMY

YTD

-12.76%

1M

-3.82%

6M

-16.68%

1Y

25.85%

3Y*

-10.29%

5Y*

-0.59%

10Y*

0.11%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AUPH vs. BMY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUPH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AUPH is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AUPH is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AUPH is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AUPH is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AUPH is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AUPH is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

BMY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BMY is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BMY is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BMY is 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BMY is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BMY is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BMY is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AUPH vs. BMY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (AUPH) and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AUPH Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the BMY Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUPH and BMY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

AUPH vs. BMY - Dividend Comparison

AUPH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AUPH
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BMY
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
5.05%4.24%4.44%3.00%2.36%3.69%2.55%3.08%2.55%1.95%2.17%2.46%

Drawdowns

AUPH vs. BMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUPH drawdown since its inception was -87.58%, which is greater than BMY's maximum drawdown of -70.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUPH and BMY.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

AUPH vs. BMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (AUPH) is 7.96%, while Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) has a volatility of 11.13%. This indicates that AUPH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

AUPH vs. BMY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20212022202320242025
62.47M
11.20B
(AUPH) Total Revenue
(BMY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AUPH vs. BMY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
86.3%
72.9%
(AUPH) Gross Margin
(BMY) Gross Margin
AUPH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. reported a gross profit of 53.89M and revenue of 62.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.3%.

BMY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported a gross profit of 8.17B and revenue of 11.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.9%.

AUPH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. reported an operating income of 21.85M and revenue of 62.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.

BMY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported an operating income of 3.52B and revenue of 11.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.4%.

AUPH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. reported a net income of 23.34M and revenue of 62.47M, resulting in a net margin of 37.4%.

BMY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company reported a net income of 2.46B and revenue of 11.20B, resulting in a net margin of 21.9%.