PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRMU vs. SPUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRMU vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CRMU

1D
-3.13%
1M
-69.93%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

SPUU

1D
1.52%
1M
0.24%
6M
14.02%
YTD
16.72%
1Y
38.14%
3Y*
31.33%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
23.82%
ALL TIME*
21.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$344.04K$316.58K$869.62K
$4.20M$4.55M$4.33M

CRMU vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CRMU and SPUU is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026

0.65

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRMU vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CRMU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


SPUU
SPUU Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SPUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUU Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUU Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CRMU vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRMUSPUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.47

CRMU vs. SPUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRMU vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMU drawdown since its inception was -91.02%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMU and SPUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRMUSPUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.02%

-59.35%

-31.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.89%

-3.83%

-86.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.70%

-9.44%

-44.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.51%

Volatility

CRMU vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRMUSPUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

229.81%

25.88%

+203.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

229.81%

33.70%

+196.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

229.81%

35.79%

+194.02%

CRMU vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRMU has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRMU vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison

CRMU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRMU
Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF
1.34%1.63%0.55%0.83%0.88%3.04%8.03%1.80%5.50%6.96%8.08%4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


CRMU and SPUU have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CRMU.

SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.34%, compared with 0.00% for CRMU.

CRMU tracks Critical Metals Corp. (CRML), while SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200% Daily). They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRMU and 0.60% for SPUU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRMU and SPUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer