CRMU vs. QTJL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CRMU (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CRMU is passively managed, while QTJL is actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CRMU charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.

Performance

CRMU vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CRMU

• 1D: -15.96%
• 1M: -31.67%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTJL

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 1.20%
• YTD: 7.15%
• 6M: 7.91%
• 1Y: 20.52%
• 3Y*: 19.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRMU vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CRMU Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF	-40.31%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	6.69%

Correlation

The correlation between CRMU and QTJL is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026	0.60

Return for Risk

CRMU vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTJL

QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 68
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 70
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRMU vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRMU	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.32	0.52	-0.84

Drawdowns

CRMU vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMU drawdown since its inception was -68.12%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMU and QTJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRMU	QTJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.12%	-33.40%	-34.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.68%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.77%	-0.01%	-48.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.07%	-7.94%	-28.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.27%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRMU	QTJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.31%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.61%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	254.94%	10.01%	+244.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	254.94%	20.42%	+234.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	254.94%	20.42%	+234.52%

CRMU vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRMU has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRMU vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRMU nor QTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRMU and QTJL in my portfolio?

CRMU and QTJL have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRMU or QTJL?

On fees, CRMU is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRMU or QTJL?

CRMU is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QTJL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRMU or QTJL?

CRMU and QTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CRMU and QTJL?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRMU and 0.79% for QTJL.