PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRMU vs. ARMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRMU vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CRMU

1D
-3.13%
1M
-69.93%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

ARMG

1D
-1.25%
1M
-46.26%
6M
220.35%
YTD
190.00%
1Y
59.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$14.17M$20.37M$65.80M
$344.04K$316.58K$869.62K

CRMU vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CRMU and ARMG is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRMU vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CRMU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


ARMG
ARMG Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ARMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARMG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
ARMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARMG Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CRMU vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CRMUARMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.23

CRMU vs. ARMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CRMU vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMU drawdown since its inception was -91.02%, which is greater than ARMG's maximum drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMU and ARMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRMUARMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.02%

-80.28%

-10.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.89%

-73.55%

-16.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.70%

-52.13%

-1.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.08%

Volatility

CRMU vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRMUARMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

50.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

128.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

229.81%

149.49%

+80.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

229.81%

145.42%

+84.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

229.81%

145.42%

+84.39%

CRMU vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CRMU and ARMG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

CRMU vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison

CRMU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRMU and ARMG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CRMU and ARMG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

ARMG has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.00% for CRMU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRMU and ARMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer