CRMU vs. AMDL

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

CRMU (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF) and AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - CRMU tracks the Critical Metals Corp. (CRML) while AMDL tracks the Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (200%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CRMU charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for AMDL.

Performance

CRMU vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CRMU

• 1D: -12.68%
• 1M: -38.92%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMDL

• 1D: 4.15%
• 1M: 12.69%
• 6M: 436.19%
• YTD: 379.29%
• 1Y: 729.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRMU vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CRMU Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF	-76.87%
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	414.35%

Correlation

The correlation between CRMU and AMDL is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2026	0.48

Return for Risk

CRMU vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRMU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMDL

AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 96
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRMU vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRML Daily ETF (CRMU) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRMU	AMDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	5.56	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.88	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.50	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	13.56	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	26.24	—

Drawdowns

CRMU vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMU drawdown since its inception was -76.87%, smaller than the maximum AMDL drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMU and AMDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRMU	AMDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.87%	-88.63%	+11.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-56.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-76.87%	-9.93%	-66.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.08%	-47.02%	-2.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	28.94%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRMU	AMDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	47.47%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	106.09%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	235.19%	137.10%	+98.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	235.19%	119.25%	+115.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	235.19%	119.25%	+115.94%

CRMU vs. AMDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRMU has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDL's 1.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRMU vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRMU nor AMDL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRMU and AMDL in my portfolio?

CRMU and AMDL have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRMU or AMDL?

On fees, CRMU is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRMU or AMDL?

CRMU is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for AMDL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRMU or AMDL?

CRMU and AMDL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CRMU and AMDL?

CRMU tracks Critical Metals Corp. (CRML), while AMDL tracks Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (200%). They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRMU and 1.07% for AMDL.