CRMSX vs. SSCDX
Compare and contrast key facts about CRM Small Cap Value Fund (CRMSX) and Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX).
CRMSX is managed by CRM. It was launched on Sep 29, 1995. SSCDX is managed by Sit. It was launched on Mar 31, 2015.
Performance
CRMSX vs. SSCDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CRMSX vs. SSCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRMSX CRM Small Cap Value Fund | -4.38% | 2.61% | 17.86% | 9.71% | -6.05% | 16.50% | -3.28% | 25.82% | -15.48% | 14.13% |
SSCDX Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund | 3.52% | 12.90% | 15.50% | 15.50% | -17.15% | 23.46% | 16.21% | 27.12% | -17.10% | 13.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRMSX achieves a -4.38% return, which is significantly lower than SSCDX's 3.52% return. Over the past 10 years, CRMSX has underperformed SSCDX with an annualized return of 7.12%, while SSCDX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.84% annualized return.
CRMSX
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -7.84%
- YTD
- -4.38%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 8.06%
- 3Y*
- 8.61%
- 5Y*
- 3.80%
- 10Y*
- 7.12%
SSCDX
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- -7.13%
- YTD
- 3.52%
- 6M
- 5.65%
- 1Y
- 24.10%
- 3Y*
- 14.77%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- 9.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CRMSX vs. SSCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CRMSX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is lower than SSCDX's 1.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CRMSX vs. SSCDX — Risk / Return Rank
CRMSX
SSCDX
CRMSX vs. SSCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CRM Small Cap Value Fund (CRMSX) and Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CRMSX | SSCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.38 | 1.16 | -0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.68 | 1.71 | -1.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.24 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | 1.69 | -1.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.40 | 7.32 | -5.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CRMSX | SSCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 1.16 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.37 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.48 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.43 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between CRMSX and SSCDX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CRMSX vs. SSCDX - Dividend Comparison
CRMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.20%, more than SSCDX's 2.13% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRMSX CRM Small Cap Value Fund | 11.20% | 10.71% | 10.29% | 4.44% | 16.87% | 12.53% | 0.46% | 7.17% | 12.30% | 16.69% | 7.54% | 23.38% |
SSCDX Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund | 2.13% | 2.21% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 4.26% | 8.47% | 0.77% | 1.33% | 2.69% | 0.85% | 1.16% | 0.87% |
Drawdowns
CRMSX vs. SSCDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRMSX drawdown since its inception was -55.09%, which is greater than SSCDX's maximum drawdown of -38.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMSX and SSCDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRMSX | SSCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.09% | -38.79% | -16.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.73% | -13.18% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.73% | -27.06% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.66% | -38.79% | -8.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.71% | -8.22% | -3.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.11% | -7.09% | -3.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.48% | 3.04% | +1.44% |
Volatility
CRMSX vs. SSCDX - Volatility Comparison
CRM Small Cap Value Fund (CRMSX) has a higher volatility of 6.61% compared to Sit Small Cap Dividend Growth Fund (SSCDX) at 5.97%. This indicates that CRMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSCDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CRMSX | SSCDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.61% | 5.97% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.41% | 12.14% | +1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.06% | 20.88% | +1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.22% | 20.03% | +0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.70% | 20.62% | +2.08% |