PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRMSX vs. CRIMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CRMSX vs. CRIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CRM Small Cap Value Fund (CRMSX) and CRM Mid Cap Value Fund (CRIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRMSX achieves a 16.04% return, which is significantly higher than CRIMX's 12.52% return. Over the past 10 years, CRMSX has underperformed CRIMX with an annualized return of 8.87%, while CRIMX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.50% annualized return.


CRMSX

1D
2.21%
1M
8.33%
YTD
16.04%
6M
15.50%
1Y
30.82%
3Y*
15.78%
5Y*
6.78%
10Y*
8.87%

CRIMX

1D
2.37%
1M
4.28%
YTD
12.52%
6M
13.74%
1Y
28.64%
3Y*
13.39%
5Y*
6.66%
10Y*
10.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRMSX vs. CRIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CRMSX
CRM Small Cap Value Fund
16.04%2.61%17.86%9.71%-6.05%16.50%-3.28%25.82%-15.48%14.13%
CRIMX
CRM Mid Cap Value Fund
12.52%9.15%8.84%6.58%-9.22%29.14%10.75%24.87%-7.00%19.25%

Correlation

The correlation between CRMSX and CRIMX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1998

0.88

The correlation between CRMSX and CRIMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRMSX vs. CRIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRMSX
CRMSX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
CRMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CRMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

CRIMX
CRIMX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
CRIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CRIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRMSX vs. CRIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CRM Small Cap Value Fund (CRMSX) and CRM Mid Cap Value Fund (CRIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRMSXCRIMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.73

1.74

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.52

2.55

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.30

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

2.49

-0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.43

8.97

-0.54

CRMSX vs. CRIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the CRIMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRMSX and CRIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRMSXCRIMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

1.74

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.36

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.55

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.58

-0.11

Drawdowns

CRMSX vs. CRIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMSX drawdown since its inception was -55.09%, which is greater than CRIMX's maximum drawdown of -49.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMSX and CRIMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRMSXCRIMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.09%

-49.69%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.29%

-12.35%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.73%

-24.07%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.73%

-24.07%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.66%

-39.68%

-7.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.07%

-7.43%

-2.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

3.42%

+0.46%

Volatility

CRMSX vs. CRIMX - Volatility Comparison

CRM Small Cap Value Fund (CRMSX) and CRM Mid Cap Value Fund (CRIMX) have volatilities of 6.11% and 6.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRMSXCRIMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

6.17%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.88%

13.65%

+0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.97%

17.64%

+1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.28%

18.51%

+1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.80%

19.05%

+3.75%

CRMSX vs. CRIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRMSX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than CRIMX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

CRMSX vs. CRIMX - Dividend Comparison

CRMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.23%, more than CRIMX's 5.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRIMX
CRM Mid Cap Value Fund
5.28%5.94%9.75%6.25%4.33%19.21%2.03%3.01%10.26%20.06%4.13%40.25%
CRMSX
CRM Small Cap Value Fund
9.23%10.71%10.29%4.44%16.87%12.53%0.46%7.17%12.30%16.69%7.54%23.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, CRMSX and CRIMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CRIMX has higher volatility (6.17%) compared to CRMSX (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRMSX dropped -55.09% vs CRIMX's -49.69%.

CRIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRMSX and CRIMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer