CRMG vs. LINT

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. CRMG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

CRMG vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRMG achieves a -72.43% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 753.04% return.

CRMG

• 1D: -3.08%
• 1M: -32.01%
• YTD: -72.43%
• 6M: -72.59%
• 1Y: -75.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LINT

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: 6.51%
• YTD: 753.04%
• 6M: 785.54%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRMG vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	-72.43%	26.01%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	753.04%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between CRMG and LINT is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	-0.13

Return for Risk

CRMG vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRMG

CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 1
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 0

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRMG vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CRMG	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.00	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.94	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.78	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.72	—	—

Drawdowns

CRMG vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMG drawdown since its inception was -79.83%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMG and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRMG	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.83%	-49.54%	-30.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-76.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-79.83%	-12.02%	-67.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.44%	-20.37%	-19.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	43.94%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CRMG	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	32.06%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	63.55%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	75.86%	167.69%	-91.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	75.19%	167.69%	-92.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	75.19%	167.69%	-92.50%

CRMG vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CRMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

CRMG vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

CRMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.

Position	TTM	2025
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.32%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CRMG and LINT in my portfolio?

CRMG and LINT have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CRMG or LINT?

On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CRMG or LINT?

CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CRMG or LINT?

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for CRMG.

What is the main difference between CRMG and LINT?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CRMG and 0.97% for LINT.